ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
Absence of susceptibility vessel sign and hyperdense vessel sign in patients with cancer-related stroke.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stroke secondary to cancer-associated coagulopathy: a systematic review.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Susceptibility Vessel Sign and Intravenous Alteplase in Stroke Patients Treated with Thrombectomy : A Secondary Analysis of the SWIFT DIRECT Trial.Clinical neuroradiology · 2025Trial
- Anticoagulant versus antiplatelet treatment for secondary stroke prevention in patients with active cancer.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Association Between MR-Based Thrombus Imaging Characteristics and Endovascular Therapy Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Cancer-Associated Stroke and Acute Endovascular Reperfusion Therapy.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: Identification of paraneoplastic hypercoagulability in stroke patients helps to guide investigations and prevent stroke recurrence. A previous study demonstrated an association between the absence of the susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) on brain MRI and active cancer in patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy. The present study aimed to confirm this finding and assess an association between the absence of the hyperdense vessel sign (HVS) on head CT and active cancer in all stroke patients. Methods: SVS and HVS status on baseline imaging were retrospectively assessed in all consecutive stroke patients treated at a comprehensive stroke center between 2015 and 2020. Active cancer, known at the time of stroke or diagnosed within 1 year after stroke (occult cancer), was identified. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between the thrombus imaging characteristics and cancer were calculated using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of the 2,256 patients with thrombus imaging characteristics available at baseline, 161 had an active cancer (7.1%), of which 36 were occult at the time of index stroke (1.6% of the total). The absence of SVS was associated with active cancer (aOR 3.14, 95% CI 1.45-6.80). No significance was reached for the subgroup of occult cancer (aOR 3.20, 95% CI 0.73-13.94). No association was found between the absence of HVS and active cancer (aOR 1.07, 95% CI 0.54-2.11). Conclusion: The absence of SVS but not HVS could help to identify paraneoplastic hypercoagulability in stroke patients with active cancer and guide patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.