Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37021225›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental sciences2023

Clinical evaluation of 3D-printed zirconia crowns fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM) for posterior teeth restorations: Short-term pilot study.

Chia-Tze Kao, Sze-Han Liu, Chuan-Yi Kao, Tsui-Hsein Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chia-Tze KaoSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Sze-Han LiuSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chuan-Yi KaoSchool of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Tsui-Hsein HuangSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/purpose: Zirconia crowns (ZrC) without veneering porcelain have become an effective alternative in clinical practice. Monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated by the dry milling method do not have acceptable clinical properties. This study evaluated the periodontal qualities of three-dimensional printed ZrC using the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Materials and methods: A total of 15 patients who required dental crowns were recruited, and all 15 teeth were restored with digital 3D-printed ZrC. All crowns were assessed at the time of crown placement and 2, 6, and 24 weeks post-placement. Clinical parameters, including plaque index, gingival index, probing depth, crown marginal integrity, and attrition of the antagonist's teeth, were evaluated and recorded. Results: According to the Modified California Dental Association quality evaluation system, 100% of the crowns received satisfactory grades. Despite the significant increase in plaque index and gingival index at two weeks post-ZrC placement, there was no deterioration in probing depth. Moreover, there was discard usage of ZrC on the antagonist's teeth at 24 weeks posttreatment. Of the 15 crowns, one tooth had to be extracted due to a vertical root fracture. Overall, the digital 3D-printed crowns showed no adverse effects on periodontal tissues after 24 weeks of follow-up. Conclusion: The 3D-printed ZrC showed no periodontal problems. It can serve as an alternative for patients, particularly those with high esthetic expectations.

Indexed as

Gingival indexPeriodontal statusPlaque indexThree dimension printingZirconia crown

Identifiers

PMID37021225
PMCPMC10068370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.