ReviewFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2023
Long term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation.
Review in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Four Decades of Occipital Nerve Stimulation for Headache Disorders: A Systematic Review.Current pain and headache reports · 2024Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of occipital nerve stimulation as treatment of chronic cluster headache: an investigator-initiated, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Trial
- Peripheral nerve field stimulation for chronic low back pain: a systematic review.Pain reports · 2026Review
- Sustained relief of chronic headache using percutaneous 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation treatment: 12-month results from a multicenter, prospective clinical study.Interventional pain medicine · 2026Article
- Occipital shuntalgia: Rethinking post-shunt occipital headache etiology and care.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
- Article
- Occipital nerve stimulation for cluster headache: lessons to learn from the 'voltage tuners'.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Article
- Occipital nerve stimulation in medically intractable chronic cluster headache.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
- A surgical decision aid for occipital neuralgia with literature review and single center case series.Clinical neurology and neurosurgery · 2024Review
- Histopathological changes in tissues surrounding vagal nerve stimulation generators: A retrospective analysis of revision surgeries.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Article
- Breaking the cycle: unraveling the diagnostic, pathophysiological and treatment challenges of refractory migraine.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) has been investigated as a potential treatment for disabling headaches and has shown promise for disorders such as chronic migraine and cluster headache. Long term outcomes stratified by headache subtype have had limited exploration, and literature on outcomes of this neuromodulatory intervention spanning 2 or more years is scarce. Measures: We performed a narrative review on long term outcomes with ONS for treatment of headache disorders. We surveyed the available literature for studies that have outcomes for 24 months or greater to see if there is a habituation in response over time. Review of the literature revealed evidence in treatment of occipital neuralgia, chronic migraine, cluster headache, cervicogenic headache, short lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks (SUNHA) and paroxysmal hemicrania. While the term "response" varied per individual study, a total of 17 studies showed outcomes in ONS with long term sustained responses (as defined per this review) in the majority of patients with specific headache types 177/311 (56%). Only 7 studies in total (3 cluster, 1 occipital neuralgia, 1 cervicogenic headache, 1 SUNHA, 1 paroxysmal hemicrania) provided both short-term and long-term responses up to 24 months to ONS. In cluster headache, the majority of patients (64%) were long term responders (as defined per this review) and only a minority of patients 12/62 (19%) had loss of efficacy (e.g., habituation). There was a high number 313/439 (71%) of adverse events per total number of patients in the studies including lead migration, requirements of revision surgery, allergy to surgical materials, infection and intolerable paresthesias. Conclusions: With the evidence available, the response to ONS was sustained in the majority of patients with cluster headache with low rates of loss of efficacy in this patient population. There was a high percent of adverse events per number of patients in long term follow-up and likely related to the off-label use of leads typically used for spinal cord stimulation. Further longitudinal assessments of outcomes in occipital nerve stimulation with devices labelled for use in peripheral nerve stimulation are needed to evaluate the extent of habituation to treatment in headache.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.