ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2023
A novel 7-chemokine-genes predictive signature for prognosis and therapeutic response in renal clear cell carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-cell analysis identifies a tumor-specific T-cell metabolic signature: prognostic model and association with immunosuppressive microenvironment in ovarian cancer.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Integrative immunogenomic and experimental characterization reveals CXCL9, CXCL13, CCL5 and CD74 as key oncogenic drivers in breast cancer.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026Article
- Identifying Prognostic Biomarkers and Key Pathways in Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma: A Pilot Study Using Integrated miRNA and Gene Expression Analysis.Biochemistry research international · 2026Article
- Deciphering the tumour microenvironment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Prognostic insights from programmed death genes using machine learning.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.