Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37020840›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2023

The effect of d-cycloserine on brain processing of breathlessness over pulmonary rehabilitation: an experimental medicine study.

Sarah L Finnegan, Olivia K Harrison, Sara Booth, Andrea Dennis, Martyn Ezra, Catherine J Harmer, Mari Herigstad, Bryan Guillaume, Thomas E Nichols, Najib M Rahman and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01985750 (Understanding the Importance of Plasticity in the Brain Mechanisms of Dyspnoea Perception), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01985750 early_phase1unknown statusnot on this map

Understanding the Importance of Plasticity in the Brain Mechanisms of Dyspnoea Perception

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2013 to 2020Enrolled90ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseArmsd-cycloserine, placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Protected characteristics reported in pulmonary rehabilitation: a scoping review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Sarah L FinneganNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2249-7612
Olivia K HarrisonNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sara BoothCambridge Breathlessness Intervention Service, CUNHSFT, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2996-4578
Andrea DennisPerspectum Ltd, Oxford, UK.
Martyn EzraNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Catherine J HarmerDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Mari HerigstadDepartment of Biosciences and Chemistry, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1053-2038
Bryan GuillaumeOxford Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Thomas E NicholsNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4516-5103
Najib M RahmanNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Andrea ReineckeDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5130-7318
Olivier RenaudDepartment of Psychology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4853-4450
Kyle T S PattinsonNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1353-2199
University of Oxford · GBOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBSheffield Hallam University · GBUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research question: Pulmonary rehabilitation is the best treatment for chronic breathlessness in COPD but there remains an unmet need to improve efficacy. Pulmonary rehabilitation has strong parallels with exposure-based cognitive behavioural therapies (CBT), both clinically and in terms of brain activity patterns. The partial N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor agonist d-cycloserine has shown promising results in enhancing efficacy of CBT, thus we hypothesised that it would similarly augment the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in the brain. Positive findings would support further development in phase 3 clinical trials. Methods: 72 participants with mild-to-moderate COPD were recruited to a double-blind pre-registered (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01985750) experimental medicine study running parallel to a pulmonary rehabilitation course. Participants were randomised to 250 mg d-cycloserine or placebo, administered immediately prior to the first four sessions of pulmonary rehabilitation. Primary outcome measures were differences between d-cycloserine and placebo in brain activity in the anterior insula, posterior insula, anterior cingulate cortices, amygdala and hippocampus following completion of pulmonary rehabilitation. Secondary outcomes included the same measures at an intermediate time point and voxel-wise difference across wider brain regions. An exploratory analysis determined the interaction with breathlessness anxiety. Results: No difference between d-cycloserine and placebo groups was observed across the primary or secondary outcome measures. d-cycloserine was shown instead to interact with changes in breathlessness anxiety to dampen reactivity to breathlessness cues. Questionnaire and measures of respiratory function showed no group difference. This is the first study testing brain-active drugs in pulmonary rehabilitation. Rigorous trial methodology and validated surrogate end-points maximised statistical power. Conclusion: Although increasing evidence supports therapeutic modulation of NMDA pathways to treat symptoms, we conclude that a phase 3 clinical trial of d-cycloserine would not be worthwhile.

Identifiers

PMID37020840
PMCPMC10068513
OpenAlexW4318070632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.