ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry
Comparative Evaluation of Effect of Different Antioxidants on Shear Bond Strength of Composites on Bleached Enamel: An
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Quercetin-Doped Hydrogen Peroxide Gels on Enamel Properties: An In Vitro Study.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the effect of antioxidants on the shear bond strength of composite resin to bleached enamel. Materials and methods: A total of 120 extracted permanent anterior teeth were split into four major groups, one among them being a control group. Group I (bleaching + without antioxidant), group II (bleaching + 10% sodium ascorbate), group III (bleaching + 5% grape seed extract), and group IV (bleaching + 5% pine bark extract). All of the groups were bleached using a gel containing 35% carbamide peroxide, and then they were divided into two subgroups depending on when the bonding operation was to be completed-subgroup A was done in 24 hours, while subgroup B took 3 weeks. The universal testing machine was used to measure the shear bond strength. Results: Subgroup IA showed poor shear bond strength than other groups, there was no statistically significant difference between subgroup IB, IIA, and IVA. Subgroup IIIA showed the highest shear bond strength than the remaining groups. Between subgroups IIA and IIB, IIIA and IIIB, and IVA and IVB there was no statistically significant difference. This shows that delaying the bonding procedure for 3 weeks shows similar shear bond strength when compared to groups that were immediately bonded after antioxidant applying groups. Conclusion: All the antioxidants' immediate application could reverse compromised bond strength. Among them, 5% grape seed extract shows the highest increase in shear bond strength. How to cite this article: Maddula DC, Vasepalli M, Martha S,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.