ArticleCanadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire2023
Identification and characterization of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria isolated from pig feces at various production stages.
Article in Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Selection and Characterization of Vaginal Lactobacilli from Healthy Algerian Women with Potential Probiotic Properties Against Urogenital Pathogens.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Lactic acid bacteria: potentials in canine formulas for puppies.Veterinary research communications · 2025Article
- Isolation, identification and selection of beneficial canine homologous lactic acid bacteria by their potential probiotic characteristics.Veterinary research communications · 2025Article
- Probiotic Potential ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Alleviating Pentatrichomonas hominis-induced damage in IPEC-J2 cells: the beneficial influence of porcine-derived lactobacilli.Veterinary research communications · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were isolated, identified, and characterized from pig feces at various growth stages and feed rations in order to be used as probiotic feed additives. Lactic acid bacteria numbers ranged from 7.10 ± 1.50 to 9.40 log CFUs/g for growing and lactating pigs, respectively. Isolates (
Indexed as
Identifiers
37020571PMC10069149W4362657572What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.