Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37020537›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2023

The current landscape of CAR T-cell therapy for solid tumors: Mechanisms, research progress, challenges, and counterstrategies.

Amin Daei Sorkhabi, Leila Mohamed Khosroshahi, Aila Sarkesh, Amirhossein Mardi, Ali Aghebati-Maleki, Leili Aghebati-Maleki, Behzad Baradaran

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed
41.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed, 182 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Cardiotoxicity of T cell immunotherapies.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Emerging Immune-Based Therapeutic Strategies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Adoptive T-cell therapies in the clinic.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Oncolytic viruses: advanced strategies in cancer therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amin Daei SorkhabiStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Leila Mohamed KhosroshahiDepartment of Immunology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Aila SarkeshStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Amirhossein MardiStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Ali Aghebati-MalekiStem Cell Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran.
Leili Aghebati-MalekiImmunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Behzad BaradaranImmunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Tabriz · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The successful outcomes of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in treating hematologic cancers have increased the previously unprecedented excitement to use this innovative approach in treating various forms of human cancers. Although researchers have put a lot of work into maximizing the effectiveness of these cells in the context of solid tumors, few studies have discussed challenges and potential strategies to overcome them. Restricted trafficking and infiltration into the tumor site, hypoxic and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), antigen escape and heterogeneity, CAR T-cell exhaustion, and severe life-threatening toxicities are a few of the major obstacles facing CAR T-cells. CAR designs will need to go beyond the traditional architectures in order to get over these limitations and broaden their applicability to a larger range of malignancies. To enhance the safety, effectiveness, and applicability of this treatment modality, researchers are addressing the present challenges with a wide variety of engineering strategies as well as integrating several therapeutic tactics. In this study, we reviewed the antigens that CAR T-cells have been clinically trained to recognize, as well as counterstrategies to overcome the limitations of CAR T-cell therapy, such as recent advances in CAR T-cell engineering and the use of several therapies in combination to optimize their clinical efficacy in solid tumors.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAntigens, NeoplasmHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveT-LymphocytesTumor MicroenvironmentAntigens, NeoplasmReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCAR T-cellchallengeschimeric antigen receptorclinical trialsimmunotherapysolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID37020537
PMCPMC10067596
OpenAlexW4327981245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.