ArticleCureus2023
A Comparative Evaluation of Post-operative Pain Management Using Erector Spinae Plane Block and Oblique Transverse Abdominis Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Comparison of the efficiency of ultrasound-guided ESPB and TAPB on postoperative analgesia: a system review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Erector spinae plane block for laparoscopic surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Pooled it
- Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block versus transversus abdominis plane block for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Bilateral erector spinae plane block by multiple injection for pain control in pseudomyxoma peritonei surgery: a single-blind randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Trial
- Erector spinae plane block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: cutting pain, not just gallbladder (systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials).International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- A hidden ally in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: quadratus lumborum block and the quest for pain-free recovery.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- The evaluation of feasibility of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy using intraoperative instillation of bupivacaine: a retrospective observational study.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2024Article
- Classical TAP vs. I TAP Using the Same Dose of Local Anesthetic in Elective Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Pain and therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Acute pain following laparoscopic surgeries interferes with the rehabilitation of the patient. Knowledge about the pain pathway from a particular area helps in blocking pain transmission at different sites. Ultrasonography (USG)-guided peripheral nerve blocks help in controlling pain better than non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) and opioids since they directly act by interrupting the pain pathway and interfere less with the physiology of the body. This study was planned with the objectives to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of USG-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane (OSTAP) block in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, to compare the analgesic requirements in both groups, and to compare the VAS scores in both groups. Materials and methods A total of 138 patients were randomized into two groups, with 69 patients in each group, and received either bilateral ESP (group 'E') or bilateral OSTAP (group 'O'). Those in group E received the block at the T7 level, and those in group O received the block in the subcostal region, with 20 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine and 4 mg of dexamethasone. The procedures were done after securing the airway. The total analgesic requirement and visual analogue scale (VAS) scoring in the first 24 hours post-operatively were observed, along with intra-operative opioid consumption. The opioid requirement, block-related complications, and patient feedback regarding post-operative pain control were also assessed. The results were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Continuous and categorical data were analyzed using appropriate statistical analysis. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The VAS scores were significantly lower during the first post-operative day in group E than in group O. In group E, VAS scoring was less than 4 for the first 24 hours post-surgery. In group O, VAS scores remained greater than or equal to 4 after four hours post-surgery, thereby indicating that the patients required opioids. Only seven patients in group E received tramadol, compared to 62 patients in group O. The mean tramadol requirement of seven patients in group 'E' was 65.71 ± 26.3 mg, and the mean tramadol requirement of 62 patients was 114.56 ± 36.8 mg (p = 0.0012). The patients in group 'O' demanded tramadol significantly more times than those in group 'E'. Conclusion It was concluded that USG-guided ESP block provides better pain control and decreases consumption of opioids post-operatively than OSTAP block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgeries. The block was found to be safe with no adverse effects, therefore it can be a part of multimodal analgesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.