Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37020312›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2023

Efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: long-term follow-up analysis.

An-An Xu, Jing-Jing Miao, Lin Wang, An-Chuan Li, Fei Han, Xun-Fan Shao, Zhi-Wen Mo, Shao-Min Huang, Ya-Wei Yuan, Xiao-Wu Deng and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

An-An Xu *Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, No. 78, Hengzhigang Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510095, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Jing-Jing Miao *Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dong Feng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Lin Wang *Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dong Feng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
An-Chuan LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Fei HanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dong Feng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Xun-Fan ShaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, No. 78, Hengzhigang Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510095, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Zhi-Wen MoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, No. 78, Hengzhigang Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510095, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Shao-Min HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dong Feng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Ya-Wei YuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, No. 78, Hengzhigang Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510095, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. yuanyawei@gzhmu.edu.cn.
Xiao-Wu DengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dong Feng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China. dengxw@sysucc.org.cn.
Chong ZhaoDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dong Feng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China. gzzhaochong@hotmail.com.
Guangzhou Medical University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CNFujian Medical University · CN

Funding

Guangdong Provincial Medical Science and Technology Research Fund A2022355National Natural Science Foundation of China 81872469National Natural Science Foundation of China 82203966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC), so as to provide evidence for individualized treatment strategy and designing appropriate clinical trial for different risk LANPC patients.

methodsConsecutive patients with stage III-IVa (AJCC/UICC 8th) were enrolled in this study. All patients received radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (CDDP). The hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk in patients with T3N0 was used as baseline, relative HRs were calculated by a Cox proportional hazard model to classify different death risk patients. Survival curves for the time-to-event endpoints were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. All statistical tests were conducted at a two-sided level of significance of 0.05.

resultsA total of 456 eligible patients were included. With 12-year median follow-up, 10-year overall survival (OS) was 76%. 10-year loco-regionally failure-free survival (LR-FFS), distant failure-free survival (D-FFS) and failure-free survival (FFS) were 72%, 73% and 70%, respectively. Based on the relative hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk, LANPC patients were classified into 3 subgroups, low-risk group (T1-2N2 and T3N0-1) contained 244 patients with HR < 2; medium-risk group (T3N2 and T4N0-1) contained 140 patients with HR of 2 - 5; high-risk group (T4N2 and T1-4N3) contained 72 patients with HR > 5. The 10-year OS for patients in low-, medium-, and high-risk group were 86%, 71% and 52%, respectively. Significantly differences of OS rates were found between each of the two groups (low-risk group vs. medium-risk group, P < 0.001; low-risk group vs. high-risk group, P < 0.001; and medium-risk group vs. high-risk group, P = 0.002, respectively). Grade 3-4 late toxicities included deafness/otitis (9%), xerostomia (4%), temporal lobe injury (5%), cranial neuropathy (4%), peripheral neuropathy (2%), soft tissue damage (2%) and trismus (1%).

conclusionsOur classification criteria demonstrated that significant heterogeneity in death risk among TN substages for LANPC patients. IMRT plus CDDP alone maybe suitable for low-risk LANPC (T1-2N2 or T3N0-1), but not for medium- and high-risk patients. These prognostic groupings provide a practicable anatomic foundation to guide individualized treatment and select optimal targeting in the future clinical trials.

Indexed as

Nasopharyngeal NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedChemoradiotherapyCisplatinFollow-Up StudiesHumansNasopharyngeal CarcinomaPrognosisRetrospective StudiesCisplatinConcurrent chemotherapyIntensity-modulated radiotherapyNasopharyngeal carcinomaPrognosticationToxicity

Identifiers

PMID37020312
PMCPMC10074656
OpenAlexW4362641021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.