Trial reportEuropean journal of medical research2023
The furosemide stress test predicts the timing of continuous renal replacement therapy initiation in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a double-blind prospective intervention cohort study.
Trial report in European journal of medical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive value of FST for renal replacement therapy in patients with acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- Guidelines for hospital nephrology assistance from the Brazilian Society of Nephrology (BSN).Jornal brasileiro de nefrologiaGuideline
- Furosemide stress test predicts discontinuation of continuous renal replacement treatments in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a prospective multicenter trial.Renal failure · 2026Trial
- Advancements in early biomarkers of acute kidney injury: from traditional indicators to a paradigm shift in lactate metabolism.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Risk prediction of continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with acute kidney injury after lung transplantation.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- Furosemide Stress Test Use in Children at Risk for Acute Kidney Injury.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Furosemide Stress Test and Cystatin-C for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury Progression in Children: A Prospective Cohort Study-Correspondence.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Spontaneous diuresis in combination with furosemide stress test (SD-FST) as predictor for successful liberation from kidney replacement therapy: a prospective observational study.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Observational
- Furosemide Stress Test (FST) in pediatric critical care: a promising tool with limitations.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
- Furosemide Stress Test and Renal Resistive Index for Prediction of Severity of Acute Kidney Injury in Sepsis.Cureus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContinuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) remains a crucial treatment for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI), although the timing of its initiation is still a matter of contention. Furosemide stress testing (FST) may be a practical and beneficial prediction instrument. This research was meant to examine if FST can be used to identify high-risk patients for CRRT.
methodsThis study is a double-blind, prospective interventional cohort study. For patients with AKI receiving intensive care unit (ICU) income, FST was selected with furosemide 1 mg/kg intravenous (1.5 mg/kg intravenous if a loop diuretic was received within 7 days). Urinary volume more than 200 ml at 2 h after FST was FST-responsive, less than 200 ml was FST-nonresponsive. The FST results are kept strictly confidential from the clinician, who decides whether to initiate CRRT based on laboratory testing and clinical symptoms other than the FST data. The FST data are concealed from both the patients and the clinician.
resultsFST was delivered to 187 of 241 patients who satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with 48 patients responding to the test and 139 patients not responding. 18/48 (37.5%) of the FST-responsive patients received CRRT, while 124/139 (89.2%) of the FST-nonresponsive patients received CRRT. There was no significant difference between the CRRT and non-CRRT groups in terms of general health and medical history (P > 0.05). Urine volume after 2 h of FST was considerably lower in the CRRT group than in the non-CRRT group (35 ml, IQR5-143.75 versus 400 ml, IQR210-890; P = 0.000). FST non-responders were 2.379 times more likely to initiate CRRT than FST responders (95% CI 1.644-3.443, P = 0.000). The area under the curve (AUC) for initiating CRRT was 0.966 (cutoff of 156 ml, sensitivity of 94.85%, specificity of 98.04%, P < 0.001).
conclusionThis study demonstrated that FST is a safe and practical approach for predicting the initiation of CRRT in critically ill AKI patients. Trial registration www.chictr.org.cn , ChiCTR1800015734, Registered 17 April 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.