Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37020236›Full record

ReviewMaternal health, neonatology and perinatology2023

Burden of intestinal parasitic infections and associated factors among pregnant women in East Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Getu Mosisa, Dereje Chala Diriba, Reta Tsegaye, Gemechu Kejela, Diriba Bayisa, Adugna Oluma, Bizuneh Wakuma, Muktar Abadiga, Ebisa Turi, Tesfaye Abera and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Getu MosisaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Institutes of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia. getumosisa344@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5337-7512
Dereje Chala DiribaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Institutes of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Reta TsegayeSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Institutes of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Gemechu KejelaDepartment of Public Health, Institutes of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Diriba BayisaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Institutes of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Adugna OlumaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Institutes of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Bizuneh WakumaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Institutes of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Muktar AbadigaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Institutes of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Ebisa TuriDepartment of Public Health, Institutes of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Tesfaye AberaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Institutes of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Lami BayisaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Institutes of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Girma TufaDepartment of Midwifery, Institutes of Health Sciences, Bule Hora University, Bule Hora, Ethiopia.
Wollega University · ETBule Hora University · ETDeakin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ultimate goal of preventing intestinal parasites among pregnant women is to reduce maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality. Numerous primary studies were conducted in East Africa presented intestinal parasite infection and associated factors among pregnant women. However, the pooled finding is not known. Therefore, this review aimed to identify the pooled prevalence of intestinal parasite infection and its determinants among pregnant women in East Africa.

methodsArticles published from 2009 to 2021 were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and HINARI databases. The search for unpublished studies such as thesis and dissertations was checked in Addis Ababa University and Africa Digital Library. PRISMA checklist was used to report the review. Articles published in the English Language were considered. The data were extracted by two authors using data extraction checklists on Microsoft excel. Heterogeneity among the included studies was checked using I

resultsOf the 43 identified articles, about 23 articles were removed due to duplications. Then, by assessing the abstracts and full texts, four articles were removed because they failed to meet the eligibility criteria. Finally, 16 articles were included in the systematic and meta-analysis.The pooled prevalence of intestinal parasites among pregnant women in East Africa was 38.54 (28.77, 48.32). In this study, variables like residing in rural areas (OR: 3.75; CI: 1.15,12.16), availability of latrine(OR: 2.94; 95% CI: 2.22, 3.91), eating raw fruits/vegetables (OR: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.16, 5.11). and sources of water as unprotected sources (OR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.11,4.35) show statistically significant association with the increased burden of intestinal parasites among pregnant women.

conclusionThe burden of intestinal parasite infection among pregnant women in East Africa was high. Therefore, efforts should be made in deworming pregnant women at the community and institutional level by stakeholders to reduce the burden of intestinal parasite infections and related complications.

Indexed as

Associated factorsEast AfricaIntestinal parasitic infectionPregnant women

Identifiers

PMID37020236
PMCPMC10077618
OpenAlexW4362635127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.