ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2023
Effects of proximal gastrectomy with narrow gastric tube anastomosis compared with total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis on upper gastric cancer.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual-suture fundoplication for anti-reflux reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy: a single-center retrospective case series.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Comparison of channel esophagogastrostomy and double tract reconstruction after laparoscopic-assisted proximal gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy of proximal gastrectomy with narrow gastric tube anastomosis (PG-NGT) and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis (TG-RY) for upper gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsOne hundred sixty-three upper gastric cancer patients were enrolled into the PG-NGT group and TG-RY group. The propensity score matching method was used to conduct a one-to-one match between the two groups with 38 patients in each group.
resultsCompared with the TG-RY group, the PG-NGT group had significantly (P < 0.05) shorter operation time, shorter hospital stay, and less intraoperative blood loss. The TG-RY group had significantly (P = 0.009) more lymph nodes dissected and greater (P = 0.014) total cost than the PG-NGT group, but no significant difference existed in the surgical cost between the two groups (P = 0.214). There was no significant (P > 0.05) difference in the incidence of anastomotic stenosis (10.5% vs. 13.1%) or the reflux esophagitis rate (8.6% vs. 9.1%) in the PG-NGT group and the TG-RY group. One year after surgery, the weight and hemoglobin and albumin levels in the PG-NGT group were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than those in the TG-RY group.
conclusionsPG-NGT may be better than TG-RY in improving patient weight loss and hemoglobin and albumin levels, without increasing the rate of anastomotic stenosis and reflux symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.