Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37020055›Full record

ReviewInflammopharmacology2023

Fatigue, sleepiness and sleep quality are SARS-CoV-2 variant independent in patients with long COVID symptoms.

Anna Reka Percze, Alexandra Nagy, Lorinc Polivka, Eniko Barczi, Ibolya Czaller, Zsuzsanna Kovats, Janos Tamas Varga, Judit H Ballai, Veronika Muller, Gabor Horvath

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Inflammopharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sleep quality and efficiency in adults with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna Reka PerczeDepartment of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Tomo u. 25-29., Budapest, 1083, Hungary.
Alexandra NagyDepartment of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Tomo u. 25-29., Budapest, 1083, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8713-9256
Lorinc PolivkaDepartment of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Tomo u. 25-29., Budapest, 1083, Hungary.
Eniko BarcziDepartment of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Tomo u. 25-29., Budapest, 1083, Hungary.
Ibolya CzallerDepartment of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Tomo u. 25-29., Budapest, 1083, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7890-0434
Zsuzsanna KovatsDepartment of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Tomo u. 25-29., Budapest, 1083, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6145-6595
Janos Tamas VargaDepartment of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Tomo u. 25-29., Budapest, 1083, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8552-1336
Judit H BallaiDepartment of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Tomo u. 25-29., Budapest, 1083, Hungary.
Veronika Muller *Department of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Tomo u. 25-29., Budapest, 1083, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1398-3187
Gabor Horvath *Department of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Tomo u. 25-29., Budapest, 1083, Hungary. ghorvath.mail@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4079-1698
Semmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute infections with SARS-CoV-2 variants of concerns (VOCs) differ in clinical presentation. Discrepancies in their long-term sequelae, commonly referred to as long COVID, however, remain to be explored. We retrospectively analyzed data of 287 patients presented at the post-COVID care of the Pulmonology Department, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary, and infected with SARS-CoV-2 during a period of 3 major epidemic waves in Hungary (February-July 2021, VOC: B.1.1.7, Alpha, N = 135; August-December 2021, VOC: B.1.617.2, Delta, N = 89; and January-June 2022, VOC: B.1.1.529, Omicron; N = 63), > 4 weeks after acute COVID-19. Overall, the ratio of long COVID symptomatic (LC) and asymptomatic (NS) patients was 2:1. Self-reported questionnaires on fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale, FSS), sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale, ESS) and sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI) showed higher scores for LC (4.79 ± 0.12, 7.45 ± 0.33 and 7.46 ± 0.27, respectively) than NS patients (2.85 ± 0.16, 5.23 ± 0.32 and 4.26 ± 0.29, respectively; p < 0.05 for all vs. LC). By comparing data of the three waves, mean FSS and PSQI scores of LC patients, but not ESS scores, exceeded the normal range in all, with no significant inter-wave differences. Considering FSS ≥ 4 and PSQI > 5 cutoff values, LC patients commonly exhibited problematic fatigue (≥ 70%) and poor sleep quality (> 60%) in all three waves. Comparative analysis of PSQI component scores of LC patients identified no significant differences between the three waves. Our findings highlight the importance of concerted efforts to manage both fatigue and sleep disturbances in long COVID patient care. This multifaceted approach should be followed in all cases infected with either VOCs of SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2FatigueHumansPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeRetrospective StudiesSleepinessSleep QualityFatigueLong COVIDSARS-CoV-2SleepinessSleep qualityVariants of concern

Identifiers

PMID37020055
PMCPMC10075170
OpenAlexW4362606104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.