ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023
Therapeutic management of allergic rhinitis: a survey of otolaryngology and allergology specialists.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo describe the current management of allergic rhinitis (AR) in Spain's specialized care according to the next-generation ARIA guidelines.
methodsAn ad hoc online survey was distributed to AR specialists to appraise their perceptions of pathology management, knowledge of next-generation ARIA guidelines (including four case clinics), and their views on the principal barriers and the actions to proper AR management.
resultsone hundred nine specialists (38.5% allergists and 61.5% otolaryngologists) completed the study survey. Most respondents (87.2%) had read all or part of the Next-Generation ARIA Guidelines, and 81.6% stated that they considered the patient's treatment choice preferences. However, only 20.2% of specialists answered according to the recommendations in at least three of the four case clinics. Most participants failed to fulfill the treatment duration according to the guidelines. They regarded the lack of multidisciplinary teams (21.7%) and the lack of patients' AR treatment adherence (30.6%) as the most critical healthcare system- and patient-related barriers to the correct management of AR, respectively. Promoting patients' education was considered the most crucial action to improve it.
conclusionDespite specialists' awareness, there is a gap between the evidence-based guidelines' recommendations and their implementation in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37020046What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.