Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37019931›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

NASHmap: clinical utility of a machine learning model to identify patients at risk of NASH in real-world settings.

Jörn M Schattenberg, Maria-Magdalena Balp, Brenda Reinhart, Andreas Tietz, Stephane A Regnier, Gorana Capkun, Qin Ye, Jürgen Loeffler, Marcos C Pedrosa, Matt Docherty

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jörn M SchattenbergMetabolic Liver Research Program, I. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany. Joern.Schattenberg@unimedizin-mainz.de.
Maria-Magdalena BalpNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Brenda ReinhartZS Associates, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andreas TietzNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Stephane A RegnierNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Gorana CapkunNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Qin YeZS Associates, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jürgen LoefflerNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Marcos C PedrosaNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Matt DochertyZS Associates, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The NASHmap model is a non-invasive tool using 14 variables (features) collected in standard clinical practice to classify patients as probable nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) or non-NASH, and here we have explored its performance and prediction accuracy. The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) NAFLD Adult Database and the Optum Electronic Health Record (EHR) were used for patient data. Model performance metrics were calculated from correct and incorrect classifications for 281 NIDDK (biopsy-confirmed NASH and non-NASH, with and without stratification by type 2 diabetes status) and 1,016 Optum (biopsy-confirmed NASH) patients. NASHmap sensitivity in NIDDK is 81%, with a slightly higher sensitivity in T2DM patients (86%) than non-T2DM patients (77%). NIDDK patients misclassified by NASHmap had mean feature values distinct from correctly predicted patients, particularly for aspartate transaminase (AST; 75.88 U/L true positive vs 34.94 U/L false negative), and alanine transaminase (ALT; 104.09 U/L vs 47.99 U/L). Sensitivity was slightly lower in Optum at 72%. In an undiagnosed Optum cohort at risk for NASH (n = 2.9 M), NASHmap predicted 31% of patients as NASH. This predicted NASH group had AST and ALT mean levels above normal range of 0-35 U/L, and 87% had HbA1C levels > 5.7%. Overall, NASHmap demonstrates good sensitivity in predicting NASH status in both datasets, and NASH patients misclassified as non-NASH by NASHmap have clinical profiles closer to non-NASH patients.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseAdultAlanine TransaminaseBiopsyHumansLiverAlanine Transaminase

Identifiers

PMID37019931
PMCPMC10076319
OpenAlexW4362608493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.