ArticleScientific reports2023
Flood sensitivity assessment of super cities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- A probabilistic GIS-based framework for urban flood risk assessment in Chengdu metro network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Probabilistic assessment of human instability in urban areas exposed to flood events.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Explainable machine-learning-based predictions of blood lead levels and school drinking water contamination among children: a case study in Washington DC.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessing flood susceptibility in a Triyuga watershed, Nepal using statistical models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Emergency Medicine at the Frontline of Climate Change: The Role of Geographic Information Systems.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- All-day cloud property and occurrence probability dataset based on satellite remote sensing data.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In the context of global urbanization, more and more people are attracted to these cities with superior geographical conditions and strategic positions, resulting in the emergence of world super cities. However, with the increasing of urban development, the underlying surface of the city has changed, the soil originally covered with vegetation has been substituted by hardened pavement such as asphalt and cement roads. Therefore, the infiltration capacity of urban rainwater is greatly limited, and waterlogging is becoming more and more serious. In addition, the suburbs of the main urban areas of super cities are usually villages and mountains, and frequent flash floods seriously threaten the life and property safety of people in there. Flood sensitivity assessment is an effective method to predict and mitigate flood disasters. Accordingly, this study aimed at identifying the areas vulnerable to flood by using Geographic Information System (GIS) and Remote Sensing (RS) and apply Logistic Regression (LR) model to create a flood sensitivity map of Beijing. 260 flood points in history and 12 predictors [elevation, slope, aspect, distance to rivers, Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), Stream Power Index (SPI), Sediment Transport Index (STI), curvature, plan curvature, Land Use/Land Cover (LULC), soil, and rainfall] were used in this study. Even more noteworthy is that most of the previous studies discussed flash flood and waterlogging separately. However, flash flood points and waterlogging points were included together in this study. We evaluated the sensitivity of flash flood and waterlogging as a whole and obtained different results from previous studies. In addition, most of the previous studies focused on a certain river basin or small towns as the study area. Beijing is the world's ninth largest super cities, which was unusual in previous studies and has important reference significance for the flood sensitivity analysis of other super cities. The flood inventory data were randomly subdivided into training (70%) and test (30%) sets for model construction and testing using the Area Under Curve (AUC), respectively. The results turn out that: (1) elevation, slope, rainfall, LULC, soil and TWI were highly important among these elements, and were the most influential variables in the assessment of flood sensitivity. (2) The AUC of the test dataset revealed a prediction rate of 81.0%. The AUC was greater than 0.8, indicating that the model assessment accuracy was high. (3) The proportion of high risk and extremely high risk areas was 27.44%, including 69.26% of the flood events in this study, indicating that the flood distribution in these areas was relatively dense and the susceptibility was high. Super cities have a high population density, and once flood disasters occur, the losses brought by them are immeasurable. Thus, flood sensitivity map can provide meaningful information for policy makers to enact appropriate policies to reduce future damage.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.