Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37019830›Full record

ArticleThe plant pathology journal2023

Different Response Mechanisms of Rhizosphere Microbial Communities in Two Species of Amorphophallus to Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum Infection.

Min Yang, Ying Qi, Jiani Liu, Penghua Gao, Feiyan Huang, Lei Yu, Hairu Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant pathology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Min YangCollege of Plant Protection, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.
Ying QiCollege of Agronomy, Yunnan Urban Agricultural Engineering and Technological Research Center, Kunming University, Kunming 650214, China.
Jiani LiuCollege of Agronomy, Yunnan Urban Agricultural Engineering and Technological Research Center, Kunming University, Kunming 650214, China.
Penghua GaoCollege of Agronomy, Yunnan Urban Agricultural Engineering and Technological Research Center, Kunming University, Kunming 650214, China.
Feiyan HuangCollege of Agronomy, Yunnan Urban Agricultural Engineering and Technological Research Center, Kunming University, Kunming 650214, China.
Lei YuCollege of Agronomy, Yunnan Urban Agricultural Engineering and Technological Research Center, Kunming University, Kunming 650214, China.
Hairu ChenCollege of Plant Protection, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.
Kunming University · CNYunnan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department 2019FH001-008Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department 2019FH001-051Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department 2019J0574Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department 2019-NYZD-25-9Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department 2021530000242017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soft rot is a widespread, catastrophic disease caused by Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum (Pcc) that severely damages the production of Amorphophallus spp. This study evaluated the rhizosphere bacterial and fungal communities in Pcc-infected and uninfected plants of two species of Amorphophallus, A. muelleri and A. konjac. Principal component analysis showed that the samples formed different clusters according to the Pcc infection status, indicating that Pcc infection can cause a large number of changes in the bacterial and fungal communities in the Amorphophallus spp. rhizosphere soil. However, the response mechanisms of A. muelleri and A. konjac are different. There was little difference in the overall microbial species composition among the four treatments, but the relative abundances of core microbiome members were significantly different. The relative abundances of Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi, Acidobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacillus, and Lysobacter were lower in infected A. konjac plants than in healthy plants; in contrast, those of infected A. muelleri plants were higher than those in healthy plants. For fungi, the relative abundances of Ascomycota and Fusarium in the rhizosphere of infected A. konjac plants were significantly higher than those of healthy plants, but those of infected A. muelleri plants were lower than those of healthy plants. The relative abundance of beneficial Penicillium fungi was lower in infected A. konjac plants than in healthy plants, and that of infected A. muelleri plants was higher than that of healthy plants. These findings can provide theoretical references for further functional research and utilization of Amorphophallus spp. rhizosphere microbial communities in the future.

Indexed as

Amorphophallus konjacAmorphophallus muelleriPectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorumrhizosphere microbial communitysoft rot

Identifiers

PMID37019830
PMCPMC10102568
OpenAlexW4361268527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.