ArticleBMJ open2023
Effect of the VivaSight double-lumen tube on the incidence of hypoxaemia during one-lung ventilation in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery: a study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protecting the non-operative lobe/s of the operative lung can reduce the pneumonia incidence after thoracoscopic lobectomy: a randomised controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Video double-lumen endotracheal tube reduces hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation in thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Disposcope endoscope guidance versus fiberoptic bronchoscopy guidance for double-lumen tube intubation in patients undergoing thoracic surgery: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Endoscopic control for bronchial blockers: Experimental evaluation of single-lung ventilation strategies in simulation-based models.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionA double-lumen tube (DLT) is a traditional one-lung ventilation tool that needs to be positioned under the guidance of a fibreoptic bronchoscope or auscultation. The placement is complex, and poor positioning often causes hypoxaemia. In recent years, VivaSight double-lumen tubes (v-DLTs) have been widely used in thoracic surgery. Because the tubes can be continuously observed during intubation and the operation, malposition can be corrected at any time. However, the effect of v-DLT on perioperative hypoxaemia has been rarely reported. The aim of this study was to observe the incidence of hypoxaemia during one-lung ventilation with v-DLT and to compare the perioperative complications between v-DLT and conventional double-lumen tube (c-DLT). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: One hundred patients planning to undergo thoracoscopic surgery will be randomised into the c-DLT group and the v-DLT group. During one-lung ventilation, both groups of patients will receive low tidal volume for volume control ventilation. When the blood oxygen saturation falls below 95%, the DLT will be repositioned and the oxygen concentration will be increased to improve the respiratory parameters (5 cm H ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (2020-418) and registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn). The results of the study will be analysed and reported. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2100046484.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.