ArticleBMJ open2023
Incidence and predictors of acquired resistance to second-line antituberculosis drugs during the course of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis treatment: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Profiling of BDQ-induced transcriptome suggests amino acid metabolism and stress responses as alternate mechanisms contributing to BDQ tolerance inMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Evaluation of nucleic acid-based matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for rapid identification ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Advancing against drug-resistant tuberculosis: an extensive review, novel strategies and patent landscape.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTo date, acquired resistance to second-line antituberculosis drugs (SLDs) during multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment is becoming a public health concern. Different studies have assessed the incidence of acquired resistance to SLDs. However, the findings are inconsistent and there is limited global evidence. Thus, we are going to assess the incidence and predictors of acquired resistance to SLDs during MDR-TB treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We designed this protocol following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Electronic databases and grey literature sources will be searched systematically for articles published up to 25 March 2023. Studies reporting the incidence and predictors of acquired resistance to SLDs in MDR-TB patients will be explored. The studies will be managed using Endnote X8 citation manager and a stepwise approach will be followed to select studies. Data will be summarised using Microsoft Excel 2016 spreadsheet. A Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality assessment and cochrane risk-of-bias tools will be used to assess the study's quality. The authors will independently search databases, select studies, assess the study's quality and extract data. Data will be analysed using STATA V.17 software. We will estimate the pooled incidence of acquired resistance with 95% CI. In addition, the pooled effect measures (OR, HR, risk ratio) with their 95% CI will be estimated. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the I ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Since this study will be based on data extraction from published studies, ethical approval is not mandatory. The study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and the findings will be presented at different scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022371014.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.