Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37018653›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2023

Endosonography With or Without Confirmatory Mediastinoscopy for Resectable Lung Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jelle E Bousema, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf, Erik H F M van der Heijden, Ad F T M Verhagen, Jouke T Annema, Frank J C van den Broek, MEDIASTrial study group

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jelle E BousemaDepartment of Surgery, Máxima MC, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Marcel G W DijkgraafAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, Methodology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0750-8790
Erik H F M van der HeijdenDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3596-518X
Ad F T M VerhagenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Jouke T AnnemaAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Frank J C van den BroekDepartment of Surgery, Máxima MC, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4828-5725
MEDIASTrial study group
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeResectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a high probability of mediastinal nodal involvement requires mediastinal staging by endosonography and, in the absence of nodal metastases, confirmatory mediastinoscopy according to current guidelines. However, randomized data regarding immediate lung tumor resection after systematic endosonography versus additional confirmatory mediastinoscopy before resection are lacking.

methodsPatients with (suspected) resectable NSCLC and an indication for mediastinal staging after negative systematic endosonography were randomly assigned to immediate lung tumor resection or confirmatory mediastinoscopy followed by tumor resection. The primary outcome in this noninferiority trial (noninferiority margin of 8% that previously showed to not compromise survival,

resultsBetween July 17, 2017, and October 5, 2020, 360 patients were randomly assigned, 178 to immediate lung tumor resection (seven dropouts) and 182 to confirmatory mediastinoscopy first (seven dropouts before and six after mediastinoscopy). Mediastinoscopy detected metastases in 8.0% (14/175; 95% CI, 4.8 to 13.0) of patients. Unforeseen N2 rate after immediate resection (8.8%) was noninferior compared with mediastinoscopy first (7.7%) in both intention-to-treat (Δ, 1.03%; UL 95% CIΔ, 7.2%;

conclusionOn the basis of our chosen noninferiority margin in the rate of unforeseen N2, confirmatory mediastinoscopy after negative systematic endosonography can be omitted in patients with resectable NSCLC and an indication for mediastinal staging.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsEndosonographyHumansLymph NodesMediastinoscopyNeoplasm Staging

Identifiers

PMID37018653
PMCPMC10419618
OpenAlexW4362658244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.