ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2023
Prediction of Brain Metastases Development in Patients With Lung Cancer by Explainable Artificial Intelligence From Electronic Health Records.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancing Precision Oncology Through Modeling of Longitudinal and Multimodal Data.IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Leveraging AI to Enhance Electronic Health Records.EJIFCC · 2025Review
- Article
- A Thorough Review of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence methods applied to longitudinal data from electronic health records for prediction of cancer: a scoping review.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Explainable Machine Learning Models for Brain Diseases: Insights from a Systematic Review.Neurology international · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEarly detection of brain metastases (BMs) is critical for prompt treatment and optimal control of the disease. In this study, we seek to predict the risk of developing BM among patients diagnosed with lung cancer on the basis of electronic health record (EHR) data and to understand what factors are important for the model to predict BM development through explainable artificial intelligence approaches accurately. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe trained a recurrent neural network model, REverse Time AttentIoN (RETAIN), to predict the risk of developing BM using structured EHR data. To interpret the model's decision process, we analyzed the attention weights in the RETAIN model and the SHAP values from a feature attribution method, Kernel SHAP, to identify the factors contributing to BM prediction.
resultsWe developed a high-quality cohort with 4,466 patients with BM from the Cerner Health Fact database, which contains over 70 million patients from more than 600 hospitals. RETAIN uses this data set to achieve the best area under the receiver operating characteristic curve at 0.825, a significant improvement over the baseline model. We also extended a feature attribution method, Kernel SHAP, to structured EHR data for model interpretation. Both RETAIN and Kernel SHAP can identify important features related to BM prediction.
conclusionTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to predict BM using structured EHR data. We achieved decent prediction performance for BM prediction and identified factors highly relevant to BM development. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that both RETAIN and Kernel SHAP could discriminate unrelated features and put more weight on the features important to BM. Our study explored the potential of applying explainable artificial intelligence for future clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.