Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37018459›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of heredity2023

A lizard is never late: Squamate genomics as a recent catalyst for understanding sex chromosome and microchromosome evolution.

Brendan J Pinto, Tony Gamble, Chase H Smith, Melissa A Wilson

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of heredity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Chromosome-length genome assembly ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sex Chromosome Turnovers and Stability in Snakes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. New Insights on Chromosome Diversification in Malagasy Chameleons.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  15. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brendan J PintoSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4243-5788
Tony GambleDepartment of Zoology, Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, WI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0204-8003
Chase H SmithDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1499-0311
Melissa A WilsonSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2614-0285

Funding

Population dynamics and medical consequences of sex chromosome evolutionR35GM124827 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI WILSON, MELISSA A · 2017 to 2024
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM124827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2011, the first high-quality genome assembly of a squamate reptile (lizard or snake) was published for the green anole. Dozens of genome assemblies were subsequently published over the next decade, yet these assemblies were largely inadequate for answering fundamental questions regarding genome evolution in squamates due to their lack of contiguity or annotation. As the "genomics age" was beginning to hit its stride in many organismal study systems, progress in squamates was largely stagnant following the publication of the green anole genome. In fact, zero high-quality (chromosome-level) squamate genomes were published between the years 2012 and 2017. However, since 2018, an exponential increase in high-quality genome assemblies has materialized with 24 additional high-quality genomes published for species across the squamate tree of life. As the field of squamate genomics is rapidly evolving, we provide a systematic review from an evolutionary genomics perspective. We collated a near-complete list of publicly available squamate genome assemblies from more than half-a-dozen international and third-party repositories and systematically evaluated them with regard to their overall quality, phylogenetic breadth, and usefulness for continuing to provide accurate and efficient insights into genome evolution across squamate reptiles. This review both highlights and catalogs the currently available genomic resources in squamates and their ability to address broader questions in vertebrates, specifically sex chromosome and microchromosome evolution, while addressing why squamates may have received less historical focus and has caused their progress in genomics to lag behind peer taxa.

Indexed as

LizardsAnimalsGenomeGenomicsPhylogenySex Chromosomeshistorical perspectivelizardsmicrochromosomessex chromosomessnakessquamate genomics review

Identifiers

PMID37018459
PMCPMC10445521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.