Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37018349›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Orthogeriatric co-management for older patients with a major osteoporotic fracture: Protocol of an observational pre-post study.

Sigrid Janssens, Marian Dejaeger, An Sermon, Katleen Fagard, Marie Cerulus, Heidi Cosyns, Johan Flamaing, Mieke Deschodt

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sigrid JanssensDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Gerontology and Geriatrics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2652-2336
Marian DejaegerDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Gerontology and Geriatrics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
An SermonDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Katleen FagardDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Gerontology and Geriatrics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Marie CerulusDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Heidi CosynsDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Johan FlamaingDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Gerontology and Geriatrics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Mieke DeschodtDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Gerontology and Geriatrics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEUniversity Colleges Leuven-Limburg · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoporotic fractures are associated with postoperative complications, increased mortality, reduced quality of life, and excessive costs. The care for older patients with a fracture is often complex due to multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and presence of geriatric syndromes requiring a holistic multidisciplinary approach based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Nurse-led geriatric co-management has proven to prevent functional decline and complications, and improve quality of life. The aim of this study is to prove that nurse-led orthogeriatric co-management in patients with a major osteoporotic fracture is more effective than inpatient geriatric consultation to prevent in-hospital complications and several secondary outcomes in at least a cost-neutral manner.

methodsAn observational pre-post study will be performed on the traumatology ward of the University Hospitals Leuven in Belgium including 108 patients aged 75 years and older hospitalized with a major osteoporotic fracture in each cohort. A feasibility study was conducted after the usual care cohort and prior to the intervention cohort to measure fidelity to the intervention components. The intervention includes proactive geriatric care based on automated protocols for the prevention of common geriatric syndromes, a comprehensive geriatric evaluation followed by multidisciplinary interventions, and systematic follow-up. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients having one or more in-hospital complications. Secondary outcomes include functional status, instrumental activities of daily living status, mobility status, nutritional status, in-hospital cognitive decline, quality of life, return to pre-fracture living situation, unplanned hospital readmissions, incidence of new falls, and mortality. A process evaluation and cost-benefit analysis will also be conducted. DISCUSSION: This study wants to prove the beneficial impact of orthogeriatric co-management in improving patient outcomes and costs in a heterogenous population in daily clinical practice with the ambition of long-term sustainability of the intervention.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) Registry: ISRCTN20491828. Registered on October 11, 2021, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN20491828.

Indexed as

Osteoporotic FracturesActivities of Daily LivingAgedHumansObservational Studies as TopicPatient ReadmissionQuality of LifeSyndrome

Identifiers

PMID37018349
PMCPMC10075455
OpenAlexW4362602305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.