Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37018013›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Lessons for Vietnam on the Use of Digital Technologies to Support Patient-Centered Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries in the Asia-Pacific Region: Scoping Review.

Leona Kosowicz, Kham Tran, Toan Tran Khanh, Thu Ha Dang, Van An Pham, Hue Ta Thi Kim, Hoang Thi Bach Duong, Tran Dong Nguyen, Anh Tuyet Phuong, Trong Hieu Le and 6 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bangkok declarations on cancer control in Asia.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Digital Health and Primary Health Care Quality: A Survey Case Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Leona KosowiczSocial Gerontology Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4780-8333
Kham TranSocial Gerontology Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7159-5668
Toan Tran KhanhDepartment of Family Medicine, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-5902-749X
Thu Ha DangSocial Gerontology Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9105-6920
Van An PhamHanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-2319-128X
Hue Ta Thi KimNew Horizon Palliative Care Company Limited, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0003-1951-5656
Hoang Thi Bach DuongNew Horizon Palliative Care Company Limited, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-7735-5294
Tran Dong NguyenNew Horizon Palliative Care Company Limited, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-9022-8265
Anh Tuyet PhuongHanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-9666-1959
Trong Hieu LeHanoi University of Pharmacy, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0001-6812-7778
Van Anh TaNew Horizon Palliative Care Company Limited, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-2924-1583
Nilmini WickramasingheIverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1314-8843
Penelope SchofieldSchool of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9495-9543
John ZelcerIverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7811-4855
Tuan Pham LeDepartment of Family Medicine, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-7386-4585
Tuan Anh NguyenSocial Gerontology Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9528-9278

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA rapidly aging population, a shifting disease burden and the ongoing threat of infectious disease outbreaks pose major concerns for Vietnam's health care system. Health disparities are evident in many parts of the country, especially in rural areas, and the population faces inequitable access to patient-centered health care. Vietnam must therefore explore and implement advanced solutions to the provision of patient-centered care, with a view to reducing pressures on the health care system simultaneously. The use of digital health technologies (DHTs) may be one of these solutions.

objectiveThis study aimed to identify the application of DHTs to support the provision of patient-centered care in low- and middle-income countries in the Asia-Pacific region (APR) and to draw lessons for Vietnam.

methodsA scoping review was undertaken. Systematic searches of 7 databases were conducted in January 2022 to identify publications on DHTs and patient-centered care in the APR. Thematic analysis was conducted, and DHTs were classified using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence evidence standards framework for DHTs (tiers A, B, and C). Reporting was in line with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines.

resultsOf the 264 publications identified, 45 (17%) met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the DHTs were classified as tier C (15/33, 45%), followed by tier B (14/33, 42%) and tier A (4/33, 12%). At an individual level, DHTs increased accessibility of health care and health-related information, supported individuals in self-management, and led to improvements in clinical and quality-of-life outcomes. At a systems level, DHTs supported patient-centered outcomes by increasing efficiency, reducing strain on health care resources, and supporting patient-centered clinical practice. The most frequently reported enablers for the use of DHTs for patient-centered care included alignment of DHTs with users' individual needs, ease of use, availability of direct support from health care professionals, provision of technical support as well as user education and training, appropriate governance of privacy and security, and cross-sectorial collaboration. Common barriers included low user literacy and digital literacy, limited user access to DHT infrastructure, and a lack of policies and protocols to guide the implementation and use of DHTs.

conclusionsThe use of DHTs is a viable option to increase equitable access to quality, patient-centered care across Vietnam and simultaneously reduce pressures on the health care system. Vietnam can take advantage of the lessons learned by other low- and middle-income countries in the APR when developing a national road map to digital health transformation. Recommendations that Vietnamese policy makers may consider include emphasizing stakeholder engagement, strengthening digital literacy, supporting the improvement of DHT infrastructure, increasing cross-sectorial collaboration, strengthening governance of cybersecurity, and leading the way in DHT uptake.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesDigital TechnologyAgedAsiaHumansPatient-Centered CareVietnamAsia-Pacific regionclinicaldatabasedigitaldigital healthdigital health technologiesdiseaseeHealthmHealthmobile healthpatient-centered careself-managementtechnologyusersVietnam

Identifiers

PMID37018013
PMCPMC10132046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.