Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37017958›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023

Biomechanical Responses of Different Cap Thicknesses of Corneas After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction: Finite Element Analysis.

Lihua Fang, Tianzi Jin, Yu Cao, Xuefeng Li, Jialin Hu, Xinheng Zhao, Yan Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lihua FangKey Laboratory of Nondestructive Test (Ministry of Education), Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang, China.
Tianzi JinKey Laboratory of Nondestructive Test (Ministry of Education), Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang, China.
Yu CaoKey Laboratory of Nondestructive Test (Ministry of Education), Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang, China.
Xuefeng LiKey Laboratory of Nondestructive Test (Ministry of Education), Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang, China.
Jialin HuKey Laboratory of Nondestructive Test (Ministry of Education), Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang, China.
Xinheng ZhaoKey Laboratory of Nondestructive Test (Ministry of Education), Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang, China.
Yan WangTianjin Key Lab of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tianjin Eye Institute, Tianjin Eye Hospital; Nankai University Eye Institute, Nankai University; Clinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Nanchang Hangkong University · CNNankai University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study analyzed the biomechanical responses of different corneal cap thicknesses after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Methods: Individual finite element models of myopic eyes were constructed based on the clinical data. Then, four types of corneal cap thicknesses after SMILE were included for each model. The biomechanical effects of material parameters and intraocular pressure on corneas with different cap thicknesses were analyzed. Results: When the cap thickness increased, the vertex displacements of the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces decreased slightly. The corneal stress distributions demonstrated little change. Regarding wave-front aberrations caused by the displacements of the anterior surface, the absolute defocus value decreased slightly, but the magnitude of primary spherical aberration increased slightly. The horizontal coma increased, and the levels of other low-order and high-order aberrations were small and demonstrated little change. The corneal vertex displacement and wave-front aberration were significantly affected by elastic modulus and intraocular pressure, whereas the corneal stress distribution was greatly affected by intraocular pressure. There were obvious individual differences in the biomechanical responses of human eyes. Conclusions: The biomechanical difference of different corneal cap thicknesses after SMILE was small. The effect of corneal cap thickness was significantly less than that resulting from material parameters and intraocular pressure. Translational Relevance: Individual models were constructed based on the clinical data. The elastic modulus was controlled by programming to simulate its heterogeneous distribution in the actual human eye. The simulation was improved to bridge the gap between basic research and clinical care.

Indexed as

Corneal Surgery, LaserMyopiaCorneaFinite Element AnalysisHumansVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID37017958
PMCPMC10082386
OpenAlexW4362602550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.