ArticleTropical animal health and production2023
Time of day modified the time required for semen collection with electroejaculation and slightly affected the quality of fresh semen in rams.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of semen collection timing on physiological responses and sperm functional parameters in Thai native bulls under tropical heat stress.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Article
- Size-dependent cryoprotective effects of curcumin nanoparticles on DNA integrity and motility in cryopreserved Angora buck sperm.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The aim was to compare some stress responses to electroejaculation (EE), and the quality of fresh semen, when ram semen is collected at dawn (06:00 h), noon (12:00 h), or evening (18:00 h). Twelve Corriedale rams were used, and semen was collected from four rams at each study time on three different days, with a Latin-square design. The time required for EE, the number of vocalizations emitted, heart rate, and rectal temperature were recorded, and fresh semen was evaluated. The time required for EE was shorter at evening than at dawn and noon (399.3 s, 480.6 s, and 460.2 s respectively; pooled SEM = 72.1; P = 0.03). The percentage of sperm with progressive motility was greater at noon than dawn (59.7% and 50.3%; pooled SEM = 5.8; P = 0.05). Curvilinear velocity was greater at dawn than evening (117.0 µm/s and 95.5 µm/s; pooled SEM = 7.1; P = 0.04), slow linear velocity was greater at evening than at dawn and noon (13.1 µm/s, 9.3 µm/s, and 8.5 µm/s respectively; pooled SEM = 1.7, P = 0.05), and the slow average path velocity was greater at evening than dawn and noon (16.2 µm/s, 11.7 µm/s, and 10.8 µm/s respectively; pooled SEM = 1.9, P = 0.05). In conclusion, the collection time modified the time required for electroejaculation and had only slight effects on the quality of fresh semen. Overall, the time of the day appears to have only slight effects on semen collection and quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.