Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37017826›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2023

Time of day modified the time required for semen collection with electroejaculation and slightly affected the quality of fresh semen in rams.

Juan Carlos Orihuela, Livia Pinto-Santini, Florencia Beracochea, Julia Giriboni, María Noel Viera, Patricia Silveira, Rodolfo Ungerfeld

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Juan Carlos OrihuelaDepartamento de Biociencias Veterinarias, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de La República, Ruta 8 Km 18, 13000, Montevideo, Uruguay. jcorihuela.porcayo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9583-5849
Livia Pinto-SantiniDepartamento de Producción Animal y Salud en los Sistemas Productivos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de La República, Ruta 1, Km 42.5, 80100, San José, Uruguay.
Florencia BeracocheaDepartamento de Biociencias Veterinarias, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de La República, Ruta 8 Km 18, 13000, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Julia GiriboniDepartamento de Biociencias Veterinarias, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de La República, Ruta 8 Km 18, 13000, Montevideo, Uruguay.
María Noel VieraDepartamento de Biociencias Veterinarias, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de La República, Ruta 8 Km 18, 13000, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Patricia SilveiraDepartamento de Biociencias Veterinarias, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de La República, Ruta 8 Km 18, 13000, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Rodolfo UngerfeldDepartamento de Biociencias Veterinarias, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de La República, Ruta 8 Km 18, 13000, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Universidad de la República de Uruguay · UY

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación POS_NAC_D_2020_1_164576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim was to compare some stress responses to electroejaculation (EE), and the quality of fresh semen, when ram semen is collected at dawn (06:00 h), noon (12:00 h), or evening (18:00 h). Twelve Corriedale rams were used, and semen was collected from four rams at each study time on three different days, with a Latin-square design. The time required for EE, the number of vocalizations emitted, heart rate, and rectal temperature were recorded, and fresh semen was evaluated. The time required for EE was shorter at evening than at dawn and noon (399.3 s, 480.6 s, and 460.2 s respectively; pooled SEM = 72.1; P = 0.03). The percentage of sperm with progressive motility was greater at noon than dawn (59.7% and 50.3%; pooled SEM = 5.8; P = 0.05). Curvilinear velocity was greater at dawn than evening (117.0 µm/s and 95.5 µm/s; pooled SEM = 7.1; P = 0.04), slow linear velocity was greater at evening than at dawn and noon (13.1 µm/s, 9.3 µm/s, and 8.5 µm/s respectively; pooled SEM = 1.7, P = 0.05), and the slow average path velocity was greater at evening than dawn and noon (16.2 µm/s, 11.7 µm/s, and 10.8 µm/s respectively; pooled SEM = 1.9, P = 0.05). In conclusion, the collection time modified the time required for electroejaculation and had only slight effects on the quality of fresh semen. Overall, the time of the day appears to have only slight effects on semen collection and quality.

Indexed as

SemenSpermatozoaAnimalsMaleSemen AnalysisSheepSheep, DomesticSperm MotilityTestisAnimal welfareChronobiologySpermTestosterone

Identifiers

PMID37017826
OpenAlexW4362602572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.