ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2023
Risk Factors Related to Polyp Miss Rate of Short-Term Repeated Colonoscopy.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving Colorectal Cancer Detection with AI-Assisted Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 38 RCTs with GRADE Assessment.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Application of colonoscopic auxiliary devices in reducing the polyp miss rate: a prospective randomized controlled study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Trial
- Bridging the Precancerous Gap in Colorectal Cancer Through AI-Enhanced Liquid Biopsy, Endoscopy, and Digital Pathology.Cancers · 2026Review
- Assessment of colorectal polyp detection along the short-axis direction of the intestinal lumen during colonoscopic observation: a retrospective study in Japan.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Advancing Real-Time Polyp Detection in Colonoscopy Imaging: An Anchor-Free Deep Learning Framework with Adaptive Multi-Scale Perception.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- HSSAM-Net: hyper-scale shifted aggregation network for precise colorectal polyp segmentation in endoscopic images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimizing colorectal polyp detection and localization: Impact of RGB color adjustment on CNN performance.MethodsX · 2025Article
- Risk Factors of Missed Adenoma Detected by Colonoscopic Polypectomy and Its Impact of the Endoscopic System.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
- Screening for Colorectal Carcinoma in India: Real-World Scenario, Pitfalls, and Solutions.South Asian journal of cancer · 2024Article
- Effect of different working periods on missed diagnosis of colorectal polyps in colonoscopy.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColonoscopy is regarded as the gold standard for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. However, previous studies have reported large numbers of polyps were missed during routine colonoscopy.
aimsTo evaluate polyp miss rate in short-term repeated colonoscopy and explore the related risk factors.
methodsA total of 3695 patients and 12,412 polyps were included in our studies. We calculated the miss rate for polyps of different sizes, pathologies, morphologies and locations, and patients of different characteristics. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate risk factors related to miss rate.
resultsThe polyp miss rate was 26.3% and the adenoma miss rate was 22.4% in our study. The advanced adenoma miss rate was 11.0% and the proportion of missed advanced adenomas in missed adenomas sized > 5 mm was up to 22.8%. Polyps sized < 5 mm had a significantly higher miss rate. The miss rate of pedunculated polyps was lower than that of flat or sessile polyps. Polyps in the right colon were prone to be missed than that in the left colon. For older men, current smokers, individuals with multiple polyps detected in the first colonoscopy, the risk of missing polyps was significantly higher.
conclusionNearly a quarter of polyps were missed during routine colonoscopy. Diminutive, flat, sessile, and right-side colon polyps were at higher risk of missing. The risk of missing polyps was higher in older men, current smokers, and individuals with multiple polyps detected in the first colonoscopy than their counterparts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.