Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37017810›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2023

A comparison of five Illumina, Ion Torrent, and nanopore sequencing technology-based approaches for whole genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2.

Ellen C Carbo, Kees Mourik, Stefan A Boers, Bas Oude Munnink, David Nieuwenhuijse, Marcel Jonges, Matthijs R A Welkers, Sebastien Matamoros, Joost van Harinxma Thoe Slooten, Margriet E M Kraakman and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Integrating metagenomics and metatranscriptomics intoThe Journal of general virology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ellen C CarboClinical Microbiological Laboratory, Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Kees MourikClinical Microbiological Laboratory, Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Stefan A BoersClinical Microbiological Laboratory, Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Bas Oude MunninkDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
David NieuwenhuijseDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcel JongesDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Matthijs R A WelkersDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sebastien MatamorosDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joost van Harinxma Thoe SlootenClinical Microbiological Laboratory, Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Margriet E M KraakmanClinical Microbiological Laboratory, Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Evita KareliotiGenomeScan B.V, Leiden, The Netherlands.
David van der MeerGenomeScan B.V, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Karin Ellen VeldkampClinical Microbiological Laboratory, Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Aloys C M KroesClinical Microbiological Laboratory, Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Igor SidorovClinical Microbiological Laboratory, Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jutte J C de VriesClinical Microbiological Laboratory, Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. jjcdevries@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2530-6260
Leiden University Medical Center · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLGenomeScan (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid identification of the rise and spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern remains critical for monitoring of the efficacy of diagnostics, therapeutics, vaccines, and control strategies. A wide range of SARS-CoV-2 next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods have been developed over the last years, but cross-sequence technology benchmarking studies have been scarce. In the current study, 26 clinical samples were sequenced using five protocols: AmpliSeq SARS-CoV-2 (Illumina), EasySeq RC-PCR SARS-CoV-2 (Illumina/NimaGen), Ion AmpliSeq SARS-CoV-2 (Thermo Fisher), custom primer sets (Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT)), and capture probe-based viral metagenomics (Roche/Illumina). Studied parameters included genome coverage, depth of coverage, amplicon distribution, and variant calling. The median SARS-CoV-2 genome coverage of samples with cycle threshold (Ct) values of 30 and lower ranged from 81.6 to 99.8% for, respectively, the ONT protocol and Illumina AmpliSeq protocol. Correlation of coverage with PCR Ct values varied per protocol. Amplicon distribution signatures differed across the methods, with peak differences of up to 4 log

Indexed as

COVID-19Nanopore SequencingGenome, ViralHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPhylogenySARS-CoV-2Whole Genome SequencingBenchmarkSARS-CoV-2Whole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID37017810
PMCPMC10075175
OpenAlexW4362602083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.