Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37017510›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Inequalities in survival and care across social determinants of health in a cohort of advanced lung cancer patients in Quebec (Canada): A high-resolution population-level analysis.

Samia Qureshi, Gino Boily, Jim Boulanger, Élisabeth Pagé, Erin Strumpf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Equity in cancer care: mixed methods clinical utility analysis of the Nursing Equity Assessment Tool (NEAT) to identify disadvantage in newly diagnosed cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samia QureshiDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (EBOH), McGill University, H3A 1G1, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7748-4854
Gino BoilyInstitut national d'excellence en santé et services sociaux (INESSS), H3A 2S9, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jim BoulangerInstitut national d'excellence en santé et services sociaux (INESSS), H3A 2S9, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Élisabeth PagéInstitut national d'excellence en santé et services sociaux (INESSS), H3A 2S9, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Erin StrumpfDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (EBOH), McGill University, H3A 1G1, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Institut National d'Excellence en Santé et en Services Sociaux · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvanced lung cancer patients exposed to breakthrough therapies like EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) may experience social inequalities in survival, partly from differences in care. This study examined survival by neighborhood-level socioeconomic and sociodemographic status, and geographical location of advanced lung cancer patients who received gefitinib, an EGFR-TKI, as first-line palliative treatment. Differences in the use and delay of EGFR-TKI treatment were also examined.

methodsLung cancer patients receiving gefitinib from 2001 to 2019 were identified from Quebec's health administrative databases. Accounting for age and sex, estimates were obtained for the median survival time from treatment to death, the probability of receiving osimertinib as a second EGFR-TKI, and the median time from biopsy to receiving first-line gefitinib.

resultsAmong 457 patients who received first-line treatment with gefitinib, those living in the most materially deprived areas had the shortest median survival time (ratio, high vs. low deprivation: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.47-1.04). The probability of receiving osimertinib as a second EGFR-TKI was highest for patients from immigrant-dense areas (ratio, high vs. lowdensity: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.26-3.36) or from Montreal (ratio, other urban areas vs. Montreal: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.16-0.71). The median wait time for gefitinib was 1.27 times longer in regions with health centers peripheral to large centers in Quebec or Montreal in comparison to regions with university-affiliated centers (95% CI: 1.09-1.54; n = 353).

conclusionThis study shows that real-world variations in survival and treatment exist among advanced lung cancer patients in the era of breakthrough therapies and that future research on inequalities should also focus on this population.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAcrylamidesAniline CompoundsCanadaErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideGefitinibHumansIndolesMutationProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesQuebecSocial Determinants of HealthAcrylamidesAniline CompoundsErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideGefitinibIndolesosimertinibProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidineshealth inequalitieslung neoplasmsmolecular targeted therapysociodemographic factorssocioeconomic factorssurvival analysistime-to-treatment

Identifiers

PMID37017510
PMCPMC10278486
OpenAlexW4362601260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.