Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37017498›Full record

Observational studyBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2023

Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in dynamic treatment regimes.

Eric J Rose, Erica E M Moodie, Susan M Shortreed

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. NO UNMEASURED CONFOUNDING: KNOWN UNKNOWNS OR… NOT?American journal of epidemiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eric J RoseDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6374-1066
Erica E M MoodieDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7225-3977
Susan M ShortreedKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

Improved tailoring of depression care using customized clinical decision supportR01MH114873 · NIMH · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MOODIE, ERICA, SHORTREED, SUSAN M · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data-driven methods for personalizing treatment assignment have garnered much attention from clinicians and researchers. Dynamic treatment regimes formalize this through a sequence of decision rules that map individual patient characteristics to a recommended treatment. Observational studies are commonly used for estimating dynamic treatment regimes due to the potentially prohibitive costs of conducting sequential multiple assignment randomized trials. However, estimating a dynamic treatment regime from observational data can lead to bias in the estimated regime due to unmeasured confounding. Sensitivity analyses are useful for assessing how robust the conclusions of the study are to a potential unmeasured confounder. A Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis is a probabilistic approach that involves positing and sampling from distributions for the parameters governing the bias. We propose a method for performing a Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis of the bias due to unmeasured confounding in the estimation of dynamic treatment regimes. We demonstrate the performance of the proposed procedure with a simulation study and apply it to an observational study examining tailoring the use of antidepressant medication for reducing symptoms of depression using data from Kaiser Permanente Washington.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremBiasComputer SimulationConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicHumansMonte Carlo Methodadaptive treatment strategiesbiasprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID37017498
PMCPMC11426919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.