Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37017318›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2023

Interindividual variability and individual stability of pain- and touch-related neuronal gamma oscillations.

Elia Valentini, Alina Shindy, Viktor Witkovsky, Anne Stankewitz, Enrico Schulz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Brain activity alterations following lumbar discectomy in people with chronic low back pain.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Intensity-dependent topographical expansion of sensory representations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tactile Location Perception Encoded by Gamma-Band Power.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Elia ValentiniDepartment of Psychology and Centre for Brain Science, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.
Alina ShindyDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Viktor WitkovskyDepartment of Theoretical Methods, Institute of Measurement Science, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5166-4745
Anne StankewitzDepartment of Neuroradiology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Enrico SchulzDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8188-380X
LMU Klinikum · DESlovak Academy of Sciences · SKTechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Essex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brief painful laser and innocuous tactile stimuli have been associated with an increase of neuronal oscillations in the gamma range. Although it is indicated that event-related gamma oscillations may be highly variable across individuals, to date no study has systematically investigated interindividual variability and individual stability of induced gamma synchronization. Here, we addressed this question using two EEG datasets. The first dataset contains two repeated sessions of tactile and painful stimulation from 22 participants. The second dataset contains a single session of painful stimulation from 48 participants. In the first dataset, we observed gamma responses in the majority of the included participants. We found a broad interindividual variety of gamma magnitudes, time-frequency (TF) response patterns, and scalp topographies. Some participants showed a gamma response with individually unique time-frequency patterns, others did not exhibit any gamma response. This was reproducible and therefore stable; subjects with a large gamma magnitude in the first session showed a large gamma magnitude and a similar response pattern in the follow-up session. The second dataset confirmed the large between-subject variability, but only a fraction of the included participants exhibited laser-induced gamma synchronization. Our results indicate that current EEG measures do not reflect the complex reality of the diverse individual response patterns to brief pain and touch experiences. The present findings question whether a similar phenomenon would be observed in other neuroscience domains. Group results may be replicable, but could be driven by a subgroup of the sample.

Indexed as

TouchTouch PerceptionElectroencephalographyHumansPainScalpEEGgamma oscillationspainstabilityvariability

Identifiers

PMID37017318
PMCPMC10396281
OpenAlexW4362601878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.