Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37017301›Full record

ReviewPathologica2023

Valentina Angerilli, Lorenzo Fornaro, Francesco Pepe, Silvia Maria Rossi, Giuseppe Perrone, Umberto Malapelle, Matteo Fassan

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Harmonization trial ofPathologica · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Cholangiocarcinoma: The era of liquid biopsy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Valentina AngerilliDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), Surgical Pathology Unit, University of Padua, Padua (PD), Italy.
Lorenzo FornaroMedical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa (PI), Italy.
Francesco PepeDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples (NA), Italy.
Silvia Maria RossiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit of Anatomical Pathology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy.
Giuseppe Perrone *Department of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit of Anatomical Pathology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy.
Umberto Malapelle *Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples (NA), Italy.
Matteo Fassan *Department of Medicine (DIMED), Surgical Pathology Unit, University of Padua, Padua (PD), Italy.
Università Campus Bio-Medico · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Padua · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a heterogeneous group of neoplasms burdened by a dismal prognosis. Several studies have investigated the genomic profile of CCA and identified numerous druggable genetic alterations, including

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaBile Ducts, IntrahepaticHumansMutationPrognosisReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2FGFR2 protein, humanReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2biomarkerscholangiocarcinomaFGFR2precision medicine

Identifiers

PMID37017301
PMCPMC10462997
OpenAlexW4362602201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.