Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37016926›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2023

Restricting diet for perceived health benefit: A mixed-methods exploration of peripartum food taboos in rural Cambodia.

Jocelyne M Labonté, Hou Kroeun, Sreang Sambo, Ngik Rem, Bohdan L Luhovyy, Crystal D Karakochuk, Tim J Green, Frank T Wieringa, Prak Sophonneary, Jeffrey R Measelle and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jocelyne M LabontéDepartment of Applied Human Nutrition, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Hou KroeunHelen Keller International Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sreang SamboHelen Keller International Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Ngik RemHelen Keller International Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Bohdan L LuhovyyDepartment of Applied Human Nutrition, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Crystal D KarakochukFood, Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Tim J GreenSAHMRI Women and Kids, South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Frank T WieringaFrench National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD), Montpellier, France.
Prak SophonnearyNational Nutrition Programme, Maternal and Child Health Centre, Cambodia Ministry of Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Jeffrey R MeaselleDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Dare BaldwinDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Kyly C WhitfieldDepartment of Applied Human Nutrition, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8315-8927

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food taboos encompass food restrictions practiced by a group that go beyond individual preferences. During pregnancy and lactation, food taboos may contribute to inadequate nutrition and poor maternal and infant health. Restriction of specific fish, meat, fruits and vegetables is common among peripartum women in many Southeast Asian countries, but data from Cambodia are lacking. In this mixed-methods study, 335 Cambodian mothers were asked open-ended questions regarding dietary behaviours during pregnancy and up to 24 weeks postpartum. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used to characterize food taboos and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of this practice. Participants were 18-44 years of age, all of Khmer ethnicity and 31% were primiparous. Sixty-six per cent of women followed food taboos during the first 2 weeks postpartum, whereas ~20% of women restricted foods during other peripartum periods. Pregnancy taboos were often beneficial, including avoidance of sugar-sweetened beverages, coffee and alcohol. Conversely, postpartum avoidances typically included nutrient-dense foods such as fish, raw vegetables and chicken. Food taboos were generally followed to support maternal and child health. No significant predictors of food taboos during pregnancy were identified. Postpartum, each additional live birth a woman had reduced her odds of following food taboos by 24% (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.76 [0.61-0.95]). Specific food taboo practices and rationales varied greatly between women, suggesting that food taboos are shaped less by a strict belief system within the Khmer culture and more by individual or household understandings of food and health during pregnancy and postpartum.

Indexed as

Peripartum PeriodTabooCambodiaDietFemaleHealth StatusHumansMeatPregnancydietdietary restrictionfood and nutritionfood taboosglobal healthlactationmaternal healthperipartum period

Identifiers

PMID37016926
PMCPMC10262911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.