ArticleJournal of intensive care medicine2023
Dynamic Prediction of Patient Outcomes in the Intensive Care Unit: A Scoping Review of the State-of-the-Art.
Article in Journal of intensive care medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic Prediction of Day Mortality in Patients With Trauma Using a Hybrid Neural Network Model: Model Development and Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Article
- Early Risk Stratification for 30-Day Mortality After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: SHAP Interpretable CatBoost Model with m-NUTRIC and Micronutrient Biomarkers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A Clustering-Based Machine Learning Approach for Mortality Prediction in Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Development and Validation.Gastro hep advances · 2026Article
- RMS: a ML-based system for ICU respiratory monitoring and resource planning.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Dynamic biomarker trajectories in the first 72 h after infarct-related cardiac arrest: a novel approach to early risk stratification.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- An interpretable machine learning algorithm enables dynamic 48-hour mortality prediction during an ICU stay.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- A comparison of modeling approaches for static and dynamic prediction of central-line bloodstream infections using electronic health records (part 1): regression models.Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2025Article
- Analysis of aPTT predictors after unfractionated heparin administration in intensive care units using machine learning models.PloS one · 2025Article
- Prognosticating the outcome of intensive care in older patients-a narrative review.Annals of intensive care · 2024Review
- Exploring the utility of a latent variable as comprehensive inflammatory prognostic index in critically ill patients with cerebral infarction.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a digital biomarker predicting acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery on an hourly basis.JTCVS open · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIntensive care units (ICUs) are high-pressure, complex, technology-intensive medical environments where patient physiological data are generated continuously. Due to the complexity of interpreting multiple signals at speed, there are substantial opportunities and significant potential benefits in providing ICU staff with additional decision support and predictive modeling tools that can support and aid decision-making in real-time.This scoping review aims to synthesize the state-of-the-art dynamic prediction models of patient outcomes developed for use in the ICU. We define "dynamic" models as those where predictions are regularly computed and updated over time in response to updated physiological signals.
methodsStudies describing the development of predictive models for use in the ICU were searched, using PubMed. The studies were screened as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, and the data regarding predicted outcomes, methods used to develop the predictive models, preprocessing the data and dealing with missing values, and performance measures were extracted and analyzed.
resultsA total of n = 36 studies were included for synthesis in our review. The included studies focused on the prediction of various outcomes, including mortality (n = 17), sepsis-related complications (n = 12), cardiovascular complications (n = 5), and other complications (respiratory, renal complications, and bleeding, n = 5). The most common classification methods include logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and neural networks.
conclusionThe included studies demonstrated that there is a strong interest in developing dynamic prediction models for various ICU patient outcomes. Most models reported focus on mortality. As such, the development of further models focusing on a range of other serious and well-defined complications-such as acute kidney injury-would be beneficial. Furthermore, studies should improve the reporting of key aspects of model development challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.