Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37016694›Full record

ReviewHuman reproduction open2023

Mitigating the economic burden of GnRH agonist therapy for progestogen-resistant endometriosis: why not?

Paolo Vercellini, Veronica Bandini, Laura Buggio, Giussy Barbara, Nicola Berlanda, Dhouha Dridi, Maria Pina Frattaruolo, Edgardo Somigliana

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human reproduction open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paolo VercelliniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4195-0996
Veronica BandiniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1788-9670
Laura BuggioDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1199-1888
Giussy BarbaraDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7760-1053
Nicola BerlandaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1797-1984
Dhouha DridiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7813-9684
Maria Pina FrattaruoloDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7288-0113
Edgardo SomiglianaDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0223-0032
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionIs it possible to reduce the cost of GnRH agonist treatment for endometriosis by using non-standard dosing regimens? SUMMARY ANSWER: An extended-interval dosing regimen of a 3.75 mg depot formulation of triptorelin injected every 6 weeks instead of every 4 weeks reduces the cost by one-third without compromising the effect on pain relief. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Cost constitutes a limit to prolonged GnRH agonists use. Alternative modalities to reduce the economic burden of GnRH agonist treatment have been anecdotally attempted. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: A systematic review was conducted to evaluate and compare the effect of three alternative modalities for GnRH use in women with endometriosis, i.e. intermittent oestrogen deprivation therapy, reduced drug dosage, and extended-interval dosing regimens of depot formulations. A PubMed and Embase search was initially conducted in October 2022 and updated in January 2023 using the following search strings: (endometriosis OR adenomyosis) AND (GnRH-agonists OR gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists OR triptorelin OR leuprorelin OR goserelin OR buserelin OR nafarelin). Full-length articles published in English in peer-reviewed journals since 1 January 1980, and reporting original data on GnRH agonist treatment of pain symptoms associated with endometriosis were selected. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsInformation was extracted on study design, GnRH-agonist used, dosage, total duration of therapy, side effects, treatment adherence, and pelvic pain relief. Reviews, commentaries, conference proceedings, case reports, and letters to the editor were excluded. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Of the 1664 records screened, 14 studies regarding clinical outcomes associated with the 3 considered alternative modalities for GnRH agonist use were eventually included (intermittent oestrogen deprivation therapy, n = 2; low-dose or 'draw-back' therapy, n = 8; extended-interval dosing regimen, n = 4). Six studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (double blind, n = 2) and eight adopted a prospective cohort design (non-comparative, n = 6; comparative, n = 2). A total of 776 women with endometriosis were recruited in the above studies (intermittent oestrogen deprivation therapy, n = 77; low-dose or 'draw-back' therapy, n = 528; extended-interval dosing regimen, n = 171). Robust data demonstrating cost saving without detrimental clinical consequences were available for the extended-interval dosing regimen only. In particular, the 3.75 mg triptorelin depot preparation inhibits ovarian function for a longer period compared with the 3.75 mg leuprorelin depot preparation, allowing injections every 6 instead of 4 weeks. Based on the cost indicated by the Italian Medicine Agency for the 3.75 mg triptorelin depot preparation, this would translate in a yearly saving of €744.60 (€2230.15-€1485.55; -33.4%). LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The quality of the evidence reported in the selected articles was not formally evaluated and a quantitative synthesis could not be performed. Some studies were old and the tested therapeutic approaches were apparently obsolete. Only cost containment associated with GnRH analogue use, and not cost-effectiveness, has been addressed. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsConsuming less resources without negatively impacting on health outcomes carries ethical and practical implications for individuals and the community, as this approach may result in overall increased healthcare access. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Corrente 2023, IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milano). E.S. discloses payments from Ferring for research grants and honoraria from Merck-Serono for lectures. All other authors declare they have no conflict of interest. REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

endometriosisGnRH agonistsleuprorelinpelvic painsystematic reviewtriptorelin

Identifiers

PMID37016694
PMCPMC10067151
OpenAlexW4362237377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.