ArticleCureus2023
Immunohistochemical Expression of p16 and CDK4 in Soft Tissue Tumors.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe aim of this study was to determine the immunohistochemical expression of p16 (p16 MATERIAL AND
methodsA total of 70 cases of both excisional and incisional biopsies of soft tissue tumors were included in this study. Histopathological examination was done by using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples. After that, we performed IHC expressions of p16 and CDK4 markers on the unstained slides of these soft tissue tumors. Results: Immunohistochemical study showed that positive expressions of p16, CDK4, and combined (p16+CDK4) markers were 51.4%, 10.0%, and 12.9%, respectively in soft tissue tumors. Positive p16 expression was observed among a higher proportion of malignant cases (66.7%) as compared to benign (20.0%) and intermediate (50.0%) cases. This difference was found to be statistically significant (p=0.009). Negative expression of only CDK4 and combined (p16 and CDK4) were observed among a higher proportion of benign as compared to malignant and intermediate cases (90.0% vs. 78.6% & 75.0%, p=0.393 and 65.0% vs. 26.2% & 37.5%, p=0.028, respectively). This difference was not found to be statistically significant. For adipocytic tumors, the majority of malignant and intermediate tumors had positive p16 (7/7; 100%) and CDK4 (6/7; 85.7%) immunohistochemical expression. These differences were found to be statistically significant.
conclusionImmunohistochemical marker p16 can be used to differentiate between malignant and benign soft tissue tumors. Amongst adipocytic tumors, combination of p16 and CDK4 immunohistochemical expression can be used to differentiate liposarcomas from benign ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.