ArticleCampbell systematic reviews2020
Editorial: Evidence synthesis for accelerated learning on climate solutions.
Article in Campbell systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE Search Filters for Exposure Pathways Linking Climate Change With Public Health.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2026Article
- Meta-analysis on comparative impact of behavioral, information, and monetary interventions on energy-efficient appliance adoption.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- Scientific literature on carbon dioxide removal revealed as much larger through AI-enhanced systematic mapping.Nature communications · 2025Article
- PROTOCOL: Behavioral, information and monetary interventions to reduce energy consumption in households: A "living" systematic review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of ex-post evaluations on the effectiveness of carbon pricing.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Protecting human health in a time of climate change: how Cochrane should respond.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Article
- Systematic mapping of global research on climate and health: a machine learning review.The Lancet. Planetary health · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.