ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2022
Influence Of "Open Lung" Recruitment On Ards In Burn Patients With Inhalation Injury.
Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Open lung ventilation with low tidal volumes, staircase recruitment maneuvers, high PEEP and decremental PEEP titration vs ARDSNet in ARDS: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the safety and impact of open lung strategy ventilation on inhalation injury patients complicated with ARDS. A prospective study was conducted in 33 inhalation injury patients with ARDS who were randomly divided into a control group (ventilated as ARDS net) and a study group (ventilated with open lung strategy). All patients were ventilated with volume control mode until weaning. The results indicated that open lung procedure was safe in most patients with optimal PEEP of 14.31±1.89 cm H2O. Within the first week of ventilation, respiratory system static compliances and PaO2/FiO2 ratio significantly increased in both groups (p<.05) but at a faster rate for the study group (p<.05). Ventilation duration and length of ICU stay were not significantly different across groups (p>.05). Duration time from ARDS onset to death and from admission to death were remarkably longer in the study group (p<.05). However, mortality rate and cause of death were not significantly different within 28 days post burn injury. Open lung recruitment is feasible and could be applied for inhalation injury induced ARDS to improve oxygenation and survival time. Further trials need to be conducted to find out the effectiveness of this strategy on mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37016589PMC10067139W4362601520What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.