SynthesisInternational wound journal2023
Perceived stigmatisation and reliability of questionnaire in the survivors with burns wound: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Post-traumatic growth and its explanatory factors in burn patients: A systematic review.International wound journal · 2024Pooled it
- Prevalence of non-accidental burns and related factors in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2023Pooled it
- Perceived stigmatisation and reliability of questionnaire in the survivors with burns wound: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2023Pooled it
- RETRACTION: Perceived Stigmatisation and Reliability of Questionnaire in the Survivors With Burns Wound: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International wound journal · 2025Article
- Effect of Herbal Bioactive Compounds on the Angiogenic Factors and Modulation of Inflammatory Mediators in the Patients with the Deep Second-Degree Burn: A Single-Blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Article
- Chemical burn wounds as a risk factor for gastric cancer: in-silico analyses-experimental research.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Esophageal chemical burns as a risk factor for esophageal malignancies: in-silico analyses - experimental research.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Prediction of immune molecules activity during burn wound healing among elderly patients: in-silico analyses: experimental research.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Antibiofilm and antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus cell free supernatant against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn wounds.International wound journal · 2023Article
- Acute burns during the COVID-19 pandemic: A one-year retrospective study of 611 patients at a referral burn centre in northern Iran.International wound journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-02-25Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Objections by Author(s) ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perceived stigmatisation (PS) can cause different effects on burns survivors such as depression, low self-esteem, body image disturbance, and social anxiety. Current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the average PS among the burns survivor population and the average reliability of the PS questionnaire (PSQ). A comprehensive systematic search was conducted in various international electronic databases, such as Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Persian electronic databases such as Iranmedex, and Scientific Information Database (SID) using keywords extracted from Medical Subject Headings such as "Stigmatisation", "Burns", "Reliability", and "Questionnaire" from the earliest to February 1, 2023. The COSMIN and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists were applied to evaluate the risk of bias. Data analysis was performed in STATA V.14 and JAMOVI v 2.3.24 software. The analysis consisted of two sections. Firstly, the overall weighted average of PS was calculated based on mean and standard deviation. Then, the reliability average of PSQ was calculated with the reliability generalisation method based on the alpha coefficient, questionnaire items, and sample size of each study. Finally, eight articles were included in the quantitative analysis. The results showed the weighted average of PS was 2.14 (ES: 2.14, 95%CI: 1.77-2.51, Z = 11.40, I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.