Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37016421›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2023

Current status and perspectives of interventional clinical trials for brain metastases: analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov.

Paolo Tini, Francesco Marampon, Martina Giraffa, Samira Bucelli, Maximilian Niyazi, Claus Belka, Giuseppe Minniti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Paolo TiniDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Francesco MaramponDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Martina GiraffaUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, San Pietro Hospital FBF, Rome, Italy.
Samira BucelliDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Maximilian NiyaziDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Claus BelkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Giuseppe MinnitiDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy. giuseppe.minniti@unisi.it.
University of Siena · ITDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEOspedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of brain metastases (BM), the major cause of cancer morbidity and mortality, is becoming an emerging area of interest. Surgery, whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), have historically been the main focal treatments for BM. However, the introduction of innovative targeted- and immune-based therapies is progressively changing the paradigm of BM treatment, resulting in an increase in clinical trials investigating new therapeutic strategies.

methodsUsing ClinicalTrials.gov, the largest clinical trial registry with over 400,000 registered trials, we performed an analysis of phase II and phase III ongoing trials evaluating different systemic therapies, radiotherapy (RT), and surgery given alone or in combination in patients with BM.

resultsOne hundred sixty-eight trials, 133 phase II and 35 phase III; the largest part having primarily the curative treatment of patients with BM from lung cancer, breast cancer and melanoma, were selected. One hundred sixty-three trials used systemic therapies. One hundred thirteen used tyrosine kinase inhibitors, more frequently Osimertinib, Icotinib and Pyrotinib, 50 used monoclonal antibodies, more frequently Trastuzumab, Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, 20 used conventional chemotherapies whilst no oncological active drugs were used in 6 trials. Ninety-six trials include RT; 54 as exclusive treatment and 42 in combination with systemic therapies.

conclusionSystemic targeted- and/or immune-based therapies, combined or not with RT, are increasingly used in the routine of BM treatment. SRS is progressively replacing WBRT. All these trials intend to address multiple questions on the management of patients with BMs, including the recommended upfront treatment for different cancer histologies and the optimal timing between systemic therapies and radiation regarding brain control and neurocognitive outcome and quality of life.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryClinical Trials as TopicCranial IrradiationFemaleHumansMelanomaQuality of LifeBrain metastasesClinical trialsInterventionalOngoing trials

Identifiers

PMID37016421
PMCPMC10074717
OpenAlexW4362601456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.