ArticleBMC health services research2023
Patient perspectives on data sharing regarding implementing and using artificial intelligence in general practice - a qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Barriers and Facilitators to Patient Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Adoption of artificial intelligence in primary health care: systematic synthesis of stakeholder perspectives.BMC primary care · 2026Pooled it
- Perceptions of, Barriers to, and Facilitators of the Use of AI in Primary Care: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- AI-Assisted Clinical Documentation in Routine Danish General Practice: Quantitative Pre-Post Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Consumer Perspectives on Trust in and Benefits of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Patient Perspectives on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Malignant Melanoma Diagnosis.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2026Article
- AI-Enhanced Qualitative Analysis in Healthcare: Unlocking Insight from Interviews of Leadership at Top-Performing Academic Medical Centers.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Public perceptions of health data sharing for artificial intelligence research: a qualitative focus group study in the UK.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in medicine: Current applications in cardiology, oncology, and radiology.World journal of methodology · 2025Review
- Review
- AI and Primary Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Dr AI will see you now: could artificial intelligence replace general practitioners?Irish journal of medical science · 2025Article
- Attitudes Toward AI Usage in Patient Health Care: Evidence From a Population Survey Vignette Experiment.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Situating governance and regulatory concerns for generative artificial intelligence and large language models in medical education.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- The Perceptions of Potential Prerequisites for Artificial Intelligence in Danish General Practice: Vignette-Based Interview Study Among General Practitioners.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- A critical look into artificial intelligence and healthcare disparities.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Placing conditions on sharing general practice data for research: Recommendations from two community juries.International journal of population data science · 2025Article
- Continued Implementation and Use of a Digital Informal Care Support Platform Before and After COVID-19: Multimethod Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to more elderly and patients with complex illnesses, there is an increasing pressure on the healthcare system. General practice especially feels this pressure as being the first point of contact for the patients. Developments in digitalization have undergone fast progress and data-driven artificial intelligence (AI) has shown great potential for use in general practice. To develop AI as a support tool for general practitioners (GPs), access to patients' health data is needed, but patients have concerns regarding data sharing. Furthermore, studies show that trust is important regarding the patient-GP relationship, data sharing, and AI. The aim of this paper is to uncover patient perspectives on trust regarding the patient-GP relationship, data sharing and AI in general practice.
methodThis study investigated 10 patients' perspectives through qualitative interviews and written vignettes were chosen to elicit the patients (interviewees) perspectives on topics that they were not familiar with prior to the interviews. The study specifically investigated perspectives on 1) The patient-GP relationship, 2) data sharing regarding developing AI for general practice, and 3) implementation and use of AI in general practice using thematic analysis. The study took place in the North Denmark Region and the interviewees included had to be registered in general practice and be above 18 years in age. We included four men between 25 to 74 years in age and six women between 27 to 46 years in age.
resultsThe interviewees expressed a high level of trust towards their GP and were willing to share their health data with their GP. The interviewees believed that AI could be a great help to GPs if used as a support tool in general practice. However, it was important for the interviewees that the GP would still be the primary decision maker.
conclusionPatients may be willing to share health data to help implement and use AI in general practice. If AI is implemented in a way that preserves the patient-GP relationship and used as a support tool for the GP, our results indicate that patients may be positive towards the use of AI in general practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.