Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37016343›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2023

Comparison of post-treatment recurrence between ranibizumab injection and laser photocoagulation for type 1 retinopathy of prematurity.

Jing-Ke Cao, Tao Han, Hong-Yi Tang, Sheng Zhang, Zong-Hua Wang, Zhi-Chun Feng, Qiu-Ping Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jing-Ke Cao *The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Tao Han *Department of Neonatology, Senior Department of Pediatrics, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, NO.5 Nanmencang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.
Hong-Yi Tang *The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, 264000, China.
Sheng ZhangDepartment of Neonatology, Senior Department of Pediatrics, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, NO.5 Nanmencang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.
Zong-Hua WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100700, China.
Zhi-Chun FengDepartment of Neonatology, Senior Department of Pediatrics, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, NO.5 Nanmencang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.
Qiu-Ping LiThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China. zhjhospital@163.com.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CNQingdao University · CNSouthern Medical University · CN

Funding

Supported by the National Key R&D Program "Reproductive Health and Health Protection for Women and Children" 2021YFC2701700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare post-treatment recurrence between ranibizumab injection and laser photocoagulation (LP) for type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), and explore the associated risk factors.

methodsThe clinical data of ROP infants treated with LP or ranibizumab in a NICU of China from October 2007 to November 2021 were retrospectively analyzed and compared, such as general condition, degree of ROP, therapeutic effectiveness and post-treatment recurrence. The dependent variable was recurrence after ROP treatment. Univariate and regression analysis of risk factors was performed.

resultsOf the 298 ROP infants (556 eyes), 58% of the eyes were treated with LP and the other 42% with ranibizumab. There was no significant difference in gestational age at birth, birth weight, sex, delivery mode, prenatal corticosteroids, ROP diagnosed before admission or after admission, and the duration of oxygen therapy between the two groups. However, the ratio of type 1 ROP and aggressive retinopathy of prematurity (A-ROP) in ranibizumab group was higher than that in LP group. The number of treatments, recurrence rate and recurrence interval in ranibizumab group were higher than those in LP group. However, there was no difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups after stratified analysis by the lesion area and the presence or absence of A-ROP. There was no significant difference in the final lesion regression between the two groups. Regression analysis showed that plus disease and ROP located in zone I were independent risk factors for post-treatment recurrence.

conclusionThere is no significant difference in the recurrence rate of ROP between ranibizumab injection and LP, and recurrence is mainly related to the severity of ROP. In half of our patients treated with A-ROP recurrences occur.

Indexed as

RanibizumabRetinopathy of PrematurityAngiogenesis InhibitorsGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntravitreal InjectionsLaser CoagulationLasersRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAngiogenesis InhibitorsRanibizumabLaser photocoagulationRanibizumabRetinopathy of prematurityTreatment

Identifiers

PMID37016343
PMCPMC10071726
OpenAlexW4362555058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.