Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37016283›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023

ICOR: improving codon optimization with recurrent neural networks.

Rishab Jain, Aditya Jain, Elizabeth Mauro, Kevin LeShane, Douglas Densmore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Recombinant Protein Drugs: A 2025 Update.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  4. AssessingJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Multi-gene Co-expression systems inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pichia-CLM: A language model-based codon optimization pipeline forProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rishab JainLattice Automation, 709 E 5th St. #3, Boston, MA, 02127, USA.
Aditya JainHarvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Elizabeth MauroLattice Automation, 709 E 5th St. #3, Boston, MA, 02127, USA. elizabeth@latticeautomation.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6628-5956
Kevin LeShaneLattice Automation, 709 E 5th St. #3, Boston, MA, 02127, USA.
Douglas DensmoreLattice Automation, 709 E 5th St. #3, Boston, MA, 02127, USA.
Lattice Semiconductor (United States) · USBoston University · USHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn protein sequences-as there are 61 sense codons but only 20 standard amino acids-most amino acids are encoded by more than one codon. Although such synonymous codons do not alter the encoded amino acid sequence, their selection can dramatically affect the expression of the resulting protein. Codon optimization of synthetic DNA sequences is important for heterologous expression. However, existing solutions are primarily based on choosing high-frequency codons only, neglecting the important effects of rare codons. In this paper, we propose a novel recurrent-neural-network based codon optimization tool, ICOR, that aims to learn codon usage bias on a genomic dataset of Escherichia coli. We compile a dataset of over 7,000 non-redundant, high-expression, robust genes which are used for deep learning. The model uses a bidirectional long short-term memory-based architecture, allowing for the sequential context of codon usage in genes to be learned. Our tool can predict synonymous codons for synthetic genes toward optimal expression in Escherichia coli.

resultsWe demonstrate that sequential context achieved via RNN may yield codon selection that is more similar to the host genome. Based on computational metrics that predict protein expression, ICOR theoretically optimizes protein expression more than frequency-based approaches. ICOR is evaluated on 1,481 Escherichia coli genes as well as a benchmark set of 40 select DNA sequences whose heterologous expression has been previously characterized. ICOR's performance is measured across five metrics: the Codon Adaptation Index, GC-content, negative repeat elements, negative cis-regulatory elements, and codon frequency distribution.

conclusionsThe results, based on in silico metrics, indicate that ICOR codon optimization is theoretically more effective in enhancing recombinant expression of proteins over other established codon optimization techniques. Our tool is provided as an open-source software package that includes the benchmark set of sequences used in this study.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsGenomicsCodonEscherichia coliAmino AcidsCodonCodon optimizationGenetic designMachine learningSynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID37016283
PMCPMC10074884
OpenAlexW4362601885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.