ArticleClinical rheumatology2023
Negative ANA-IIF in SLE patients: what is beyond?
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- A cost-optimized 5-protein panel revolutionizes systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosis.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Anti-dsDNA Antibodies in Laboratory Practice: Management of Different Analytical Methods and Correlation with HEp-2 Immunofluorescence Patterns.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of antinuclear antibody detection by indirect immunofluorescence and line immunoassay with clinical correlation in suspected autoimmune disease patients: a retrospective cross-sectional study.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Fluorescent probes in autoimmune disease research: current status and future prospects.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Identification of patients with ANA-negative and double-stranded DNA positive: what is the significance in daily rheumatology practice?Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- Rare head and neck myositis with reversible myelodysplastic syndrome: The first reported lupus manifestation as an initial symptom.Qatar medical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The antinuclear antibody (ANA) test has high sensitivity in diagnosing and classifying systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
objectivesTo describe the immunological pattern of SLE patients through investigating specific antinuclear autoantibodies by enzyme dot immunoassay and studying their frequency in both positive and negative ANA indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIF) cases.
methodsIn a cross-sectional study, blood samples from 393 newly diagnosed SLE patients were analyzed using (IIF) on HEp-2 cells and ANA dot immunoassay by automated enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to detect 19 antibodies.
resultsNinety-one percent of the patients are females; their mean age was 37 ± 12.28. Antinuclear antibody (ANA) was detected by IIF in 82.4% of cases, with 181 (46.1%) speckled and 167 (42.4%) homogeneous ANA patterns. The majority of patients (96%) demonstrated autoantibodies via EIA. Among the ANA-IIF-negative patients, 97.2% demonstrated autoantibodies. There was a significant difference in the frequency of certain autoantibodies between SLE patients with negative and positive ANA-IIF (1.44 0.73, 3.12 2.09, p = 0.00) respectively.
conclusionThe results of analyzing 19 autoantibodies with the ANA staining pattern increased the significance of analyzing the immune profile even if IIF is negative when clinical symptoms strongly suggest SLE diagnosis. Certain autoantibodies may evade staining by the IFA approach while they are present in the patient's serum, and they may not be detected by the ANA EIA profile if it does not contain that antigenic substrate. Key Points • Indirect immunofluorescence on Hep-2 is the conventional method for ANA detection and is regarded as the "gold standard" for testing in clinical practice for SLE. • In our study, ANA profile dot enzyme immunoassay (EIA)-based test was performed to evaluate 19 autoantibodies in SLE patients either positive or negative for ANA-IIF. • The presence of anti-dsDNA with ANA-IIF-negative serum in 32.4% of SLE patients provides evidence that not all anti-dsDNA antibodies are identified on standard HEp-2 substrates. • certain autoantibodies can evade staining by the ANA-IIF method despite being present in the SLE patient's blood; this supports the ANA profile enzyme dot immunoassay as a more sensitive test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.