Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37016179›Full record

ArticleMolecular biotechnology2024

Effect of Force Field Resolution on Membrane Mechanical Response and Mechanoporation Damage under Deformation Simulations.

Anh T N Vo, Michael A Murphy, Phong K Phan, Raj K Prabhu, Tonya W Stone

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ultrasound-responsive liposomes: A mechanistic framework to decode the effects of acoustic parameters.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Martini on the Rocks: Can a Coarse-Grained Force Field Model Crystals?The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anh T N VoCenter for Advanced Vehicular Systems (CAVS), Mississippi State University, 200 Research Blvd, Starkville, MS, 39759, USA. atv55@msstate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4684-9301
Michael A MurphyCenter for Advanced Vehicular Systems (CAVS), Mississippi State University, 200 Research Blvd, Starkville, MS, 39759, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9158-1709
Phong K PhanCenter for Advanced Vehicular Systems (CAVS), Mississippi State University, 200 Research Blvd, Starkville, MS, 39759, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1965-224X
Raj K PrabhuNASA Johnson Space Center, 2101 NASA Parkway, Houston, TX, 77058, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6073-4802
Tonya W StoneCenter for Advanced Vehicular Systems (CAVS), Mississippi State University, 200 Research Blvd, Starkville, MS, 39759, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8070-1928

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Damage induced by transient disruption and mechanoporation in an intact cell membrane is a vital nanoscale biomechanical mechanism that critically affects cell viability. To complement experimental studies of mechanical membrane damage and disruption, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have been performed at different force field resolutions, each of which follows different parameterization strategies and thus may influence the properties and dynamics of membrane systems. Therefore, the current study performed tensile deformation MD simulations of bilayer membranes using all-atom (AA), united-atom (UA), and coarse-grained Martini (CG-M) models to investigate how the damage biomechanics differs across atomistic and coarse-grained (CG) simulations. The mechanical response and mechanoporation damage were qualitatively similar but quantitatively different in the three models, including some progressive changes based on the coarse-graining level. The membranes yielded and reached ultimate strength at similar strains; however, the coarser systems exhibited lower average yield stresses and failure strains. The average failure strain in the UA model was approximately 7% lower than the AA, and the CG-M was 20% lower than UA and 27% lower than AA. The CG systems also nucleated a higher number of pores and larger pores, which resulted in higher damage during the deformation process. Overall, the study provides insight on the impact of force field-a critical factor in modeling biomolecular systems and their interactions-in inspecting membrane mechanosensitive responses and serves as a reference for justifying the appropriate force field for future studies of more complex membranes and more diverse biomolecular assemblies.

Indexed as

Cell MembraneLipid BilayersMolecular Dynamics SimulationBiomechanical PhenomenaStress, MechanicalTensile StrengthLipid BilayersAll-atomBilayer membraneCoarse-grainedDeformationForce fieldMechanoporationMolecular dynamicsUnited-atom

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.