Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37016107›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2023

Responsiveness and minimal important change of seven PROMIS computerized adaptive tests (CAT) in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.

Caroline B Terwee, Esmee M van der Willik, Fenna van Breda, Brigit C van Jaarsveld, Marlon van de Putte, Isabelle W Jetten, Friedo W Dekker, Yvette Meuleman, Frans J van Ittersum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Psychometric evaluation of PROMISQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  2. Measurement properties of the USER-Participation Restriction subscale and PROMISQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Caroline B TerweeDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit, P.O. box 7057, Amsterdam, 1007 MB, the Netherlands. cb.terwee@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-4570-2826
Esmee M van der WillikDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit, P.O. box 7057, Amsterdam, 1007 MB, the Netherlands.
Fenna van BredaDepartment of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Brigit C van JaarsveldDepartment of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marlon van de PutteDepartment of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Isabelle W JettenDepartment of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Friedo W DekkerDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Yvette MeulemanDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Frans J van IttersumDepartment of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) has the potential to harmonize the measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQL) across medical conditions. We evaluated responsiveness and minimal important change (MIC) of seven Dutch-Flemish PROMIS computerized adaptive tests (CAT) in Dutch patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD).

methodsCKD patients (eGFR < 30 ml/min.1.73m

results207 patients were included; 186 (90%) completed the follow-up. Most results were in accordance with expectations (70-91% of hypotheses confirmed), with some exceptions for PROMIS Anxiety and Ability to Participate (60% and 42% of hypotheses confirmed, respectively). For PROMIS Anxiety and Depression correlations with the GRS were too low (0.04 and 0.20, respectively) to calculate a MIC. MIC values, representing minimal important deterioration, ranged from 0.4 to 2.5 T-score points for the other domains.

conclusionWe found sufficient responsiveness of PROMIS CATs Physical Function, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, and Depression. The results for PROMIS CATs Pain Interference were almost sufficient, but some results for Anxiety and Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities were not as expected. Reported MIC values should be interpreted with caution because most patients did not change.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresRenal Insufficiency, ChronicFatigueHumansPainQuality of LifeRenal DialysisChronic kidney disease (CKD)Minimal important change (MIC)Patient-reported outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs)Responsiveness

Identifiers

PMID37016107
PMCPMC10073363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.