Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37016089›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2023

Physical and mental health of breast cancer patients and survivors before and during successive SARS-CoV-2-infection waves.

Claudia A Bargon, Dieuwke R Mink van der Molen, Marilot C T Batenburg, Lilianne E van Stam, Iris E van Dam, Inge O Baas, Liesbeth M Veenendaal, Wiesje Maarse, Maartje Sier, Ernst J P Schoenmaeckers and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia A BargonDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Cancer Centre, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. claudia.bargon@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5558-1530
Dieuwke R Mink van der MolenDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Cancer Centre, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marilot C T BatenburgDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Cancer Centre, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lilianne E van StamDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Cancer Centre, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Iris E van DamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Cancer Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Inge O BaasDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Cancer Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Liesbeth M VeenendaalDepartment of Surgery, Alexander Monro Hospital, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Wiesje MaarseDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maartje SierDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ernst J P SchoenmaeckersDepartment of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Josephina P J BurgmansDepartment of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rhodé M BijlsmaDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Cancer Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Femke van der LeijDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Cancer Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Annemiek DoeksenDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Danny A Young-AfatDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Helena M VerkooijenDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Cancer Centre, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. H.M.Verkooijen@umcutrecht.nl.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLAlexander Monro Ziekenhuis · NLDiakonessenhuis hospital · NLMeander Medisch Centrum · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDuring the first SARS-CoV-2-infection wave, a deterioration in emotional well-being and increased need for mental health care were observed among patients treated or being treated for breast cancer. In this follow-up study, we assessed patient-reported quality of life (QoL), physical functioning, and psychosocial well-being during the second SARS-CoV-2-infection wave in a large, representative cohort.

methodsThis longitudinal cohort study was conducted within the prospective, multicenter UMBRELLA breast cancer cohort. To assess patient-reported QoL, physical functioning and psychosocial well-being, COVID-19-specific surveys were completed by patients during the first and second SARS-CoV-2-infection waves (April and November 2020, respectively). An identical survey was completed by a comparable reference population during the second SARS-CoV-2-infection waves. All surveys included the validated EORTC-QLQ-C30/BR23, HADS and "De Jong-Gierveld Loneliness" questionnaires. Pre-COVID-19 EORTC-QLQ-C30/BR23 and HADS outcomes were available from UMBRELLA. Response rates were 69.3% (n = 1106/1595) during the first SARS-CoV-2-infection wave and 50.9% (n = 822/1614) during the second wave. A total of 696 patients responded during both SARS-CoV-2-infection waves and were included in the analysis comparing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) during the second SARS-CoV-2-infection wave to PROs during the first wave. Moreover, PROs reported by all patients during the second SARS-CoV-2-infection wave (n = 822) were compared to PROs of a similar non-cancer reference population (n = 241) and to their pre-COVID-19 PROs.

resultsPatient-reported QoL, physical functioning, and psychosocial well-being of patients treated or being treated for breast cancer remained stable or improved from the first to the second SARS-CoV-2-infection wave. The proportion of emotional loneliness reduced from 37.6 to 29.9% of patients. Compared to a similar non-cancer reference population, physical, emotional, and cognitive functioning, future perspectives and symptoms of dyspnea and insomnia were worse in patients treated or being treated for breast cancer during the second SARS-CoV-2-infection wave. PROs in the second wave were similar to pre-COVID-19 PROs.

conclusionAlthough patients scored overall worse than individuals without breast cancer, QoL, physical functioning, and psychosocial well-being did not deteriorate between the first and second wave. During the second wave, PROs were similar to pre-COVID-19 values. Overall, current findings are cautiously reassuring for future mental health of patients treated or being treated for breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCOVID-19FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMental HealthProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSARS-CoV-2SurvivorsBreast cancerCorona virusCOVID-19LongitudinalMental healthPandemicPatient-reported outcomesPsychosocial well-beingSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37016089
PMCPMC10072805
OpenAlexW4362594143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.