ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2023
Staphylococcus nasal colonization in three species of non-human primates.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- First report and antimicrobial resistance profile of Staphylococcus nepalensis in a snake (Lampropeltis triangulum) in Brazil.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Genomic and phenotypic characterization of staphylococci isolated from the skin of non-human primates.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial nasal colonization is common in many mammals and Staphylococcus represents the main pathogen isolated. Staphylococcus nasal carriage in humans constitutes a risk factor for Staphylococcus infections pointing out the need for animal experimentation for nasal colonization studies, especially for vaccine development. A limitation in addressing this hypothesis has been a lack of appropriate animal model. Murine models do not mimic human nasal colonization studies. Non-human primates (NHP) remain the best classical models for nasal colonization studies. In this study, we analyzed nasal colonization between two species of Old World monkeys (cynomolgus and rhesus) and a New World monkey (squirrel monkey) from breeding colony at Fiocruz (Brazil). Sixty male and female NHP with the average age of 1-21 years old, comprising twenty animals of each species, were analyzed. Nine different Staphylococcus species (S. aureus, S. cohnii, S. saprophyticus, S. haemolyticus, S. xylosus, S. warneri, S. nepalensis, S. simiae, and S. kloosi) were identified by MALDI-TOF and 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses. Antibiotic resistance was not detected among the isolated bacterial population. S. aureus was the main isolate (19 strains), present in all species, predominant in cynomolgus monkeys (9/20) and squirrel monkeys (7/20). spa typing was used to examine the clonal structure and genetic profile of Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Eight (8) spa types were identified among the S. aureus strains. A major cluster was identified, corresponding to a new spa type t20455, and no spa types found in this study were seen before in Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.