Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37015792›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Rate pressure product as a novel predictor of long-term adverse outcomes in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective cohort study.

Zhi-Hui Jiang, Abudula Aierken, Ting-Ting Wu, Ying-Ying Zheng, Yi-Tong Ma, Xiang Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Acute effects of binge drinking following aerobic exercise on autonomic and hemodynamic recovery in young men: a randomized crossover trial.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhi-Hui JiangDepartment of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Abudula AierkenDepartment of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Ting-Ting WuDepartment of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Ying-Ying ZhengDepartment of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Yi-Tong MaDepartment of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Xiang XieDepartment of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China xiangxie999@sina.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0632-4626

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrevious studies have suggested that heart rate and blood pressure play important roles in the development of adverse outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the relationship between the rate pressure product (RPP) and long-term outcomes has rarely been investigated. This study investigated the effects of RPP on the clinical outcomes of patients with CAD who underwent PCI.

designIn this study, a total of 6015 patients with CAD were enrolled. All patients were from the CORFCHD-PCI (Clinical Outcomes and Risk Factors of Patients with Coronary Heart Disease after PCI) Study. They were divided into two groups according to RPP (RPP <10 269, n=4018 and RPP ≥10 269, n=1997). In addition, the median follow-up time was 32 months.

participantsData was obtained from 6050 patients with CAD who underwent PCI at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2008 to December 2016. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was long-term mortality, including all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiac mortality (CM). The secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs).

resultsWe found that there were significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of ACM, CM, MACCEs and MACEs (all p<0.05). Among the patients with CAD having ACM, CM, MACCEs and MACEs, the mean survival time of the low-value group was significantly higher than that of the high-value group. Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that RPP was an independent predictor for ACM (HR=1.605, 95% CI: 1.215-2.120, p=0.001), CM (HR=1.733, 95% CI: 1.267-2.369, p=0.001), MACCEs (HR=1.271, 95% CI: 1.063-1.518, p=0.008) and MACEs (HR=1.315, 95% CI: 1.092-1.584, p=0.004) in patients with stable CAD. On the other hand, there was no significant correlation between the RPP and the adverse outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

conclusionIn summary, RPP is an independent predictor of long-term prognosis in patients with CAD who underwent PCI. A higher baseline RPP before PCI increased the risk of adverse outcomes. Compared with heart rate and blood pressure alone, RPP has a higher predictive value for adverse clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseasePercutaneous Coronary InterventionHumansPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeCardiologyCoronary heart diseaseCoronary interventionGERIATRIC MEDICINEMyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID37015792
PMCPMC10083747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.